Paper · 2024 · OALib

Evaluation of Some Cowpea Genotypes for Maize-Cowpea Intercropping System in the Sudan Savannah Ecology of Ghana

Aziiba Emmanuel Asibi; Richard Dormatey; Julius Yirzagla; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

For smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa, determining which cowpea genotype is most promising for intercropping systems involving maize and cowpeas can be difficult.It is challenging for smallholder farmers in northern Ghana to identify the most promising cowpea genotype to combine with maize.In the 2021 and 2022 cropping seasons, twenty-nine cowpea genotypes were grown from July to October at the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research-Savannah Agricultural Research Institute research field in Manga, both as sole crops and as intercrops with maize.Days to 50% flowering-days after planting (DAP), pod load per plant, days to 95% pod maturity-days after planting (DAP), and cowpea grain, and biomass yields per hectare were among the data gathered.The findings demonstrated significant genotype-to-genotype variability in days to 50% flowering, pod load, days to 95% pod maturity, grain, and biomass yields in both cropping systems.Days to 50% flowering, days to 95% pod maturity and genotype-specific grain and biomass yields were not always correlated.This may be caused by the various cultivation methods and the unique genotypes' genetic makeup.As a result, the study offers a basic comprehension of the essential traits of some cowpea genotypes, which could be helpful for upcoming breeding initiatives that focus on intercropping systems.According to the study, intercropping can maximize the grain and biomass yields of some cowpea genotypes in an environmentally sustainable way.Maize and cowpea are more competitive when intercropped than planted sole,

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea genotypes differed significantly in flowering, pod load, maturity, grain yield and biomass yield in both cropping systems.

Taxon
genotypese1
Outcome
days to 50% flowering, pod load, days to 95% pod maturity, grain, and biomass yieldse0
Setting
both cropping systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“The findings demonstrated significant genotype-to-genotype variability in days to 50% flowering, pod load, days to 95% pod maturity, grain, and biomass yields in both cropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“essential traits of some cowpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1267 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering and maturity timing were not always correlated with genotype-specific grain and biomass yields.

Taxon
genotypee0
Organ / stage
days to 50% flowering, days to 95% pod maturitye0
Outcome
grain and biomass yieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Days to 50% flowering, days to 95% pod maturity and genotype-specific grain and biomass yields were not always correlated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping can maximize grain and biomass yields of some cowpea genotypes.

Treatment
intercroppinge0
Outcome
grain and biomass yieldse0
Direction
maximizee0
Qualifier
some cowpea genotypese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping can maximize the grain and biomass yields of some cowpea genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Cowpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize and cowpea were more competitive in intercropping than sole planting.

Treatment
intercroppede0
Outcome
competitivee0
Direction
more competitivee0
Comparator
planted solee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize and cowpea are more competitive when intercropped than planted sole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1578 · show in text ↑
t0

“Some Cowpea Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–35 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

103 papers: 63 positive, 40 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.