Paper · 2024 · Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine

Plants of the USA: recordings on native North American useful species by Alexander von Humboldt

Leopoldo C. Baratto; Ulrich Päßler

14
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The German naturalist Alexander von Humboldt conducted an expedition through the American continent, alongside Aimé Bonpland, from 1799 to 1804. Before finally returning to Europe, they decided to take a side trip to the USA between May 20 and July 7, 1804. Humboldt's most detailed account of his time in the USA consists of a manuscript entitled "Plantae des États-Unis" (1804), containing information on useful plants and timber of the country. The aim of this paper is to retrieve, for the first time, ethnobotanical information regarding North American plants and their uses inside this Humboldt's manuscript as well as to highlight the erasure and invisibilization of North American Indigenous knowledge within historical documents and bibliography, mainly during the nineteenth century. METHODS: "Plantae des États-Unis" (digitized version and its transcription) was carefully analyzed, and information on plant species mentioned in the manuscript (including botanical and vernacular names, traditional uses, and general observations) was retrieved. Traditional uses were correlated with ethnobotanical data from the Native American Ethnobotany Database and encyclopedic literature on North American plants from the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, as well as recent pharmacological studies searched in scientific papers. RESULTS: In the manuscript are mentioned 28 species distributed in 15 botanical families, with Fagaceae (9 Quercus species) being the most representative. All species are USA natives, except for one undetermined species (only the genus was mentioned, Corylus). Four species were directly mentioned as medicinal (Toxicodendron radicans, Liriodendron tulipifera, Actaea racemosa, and Gillenia stipulata), while other four were described as tanning agents (astringent) (Cornus florida, Diospyros virginiana, Quercus rubra, and Quercus velutina). Two species were described as bitter (Xanthorhiza simplicissima and A. racemosa). Nine Quercus species were described, but five were reported as the most useful oaks for cultivation in Europe (Quercus bicolor, Quercus castanea, Quercus virginiana, Quercus michauxii, and Quercus alba); three of them were used for ship construction (Q. virginiana, Q. michauxii, and Q. alba), two as astringent (Q. rubra and Q. stellata), and one had wood of poor quality (Quercus phellos). One species was described as a yellow dye (Hydrastis canadensis), and the other was mentioned as toxic (Aesculus pavia). Ten species did not have any useful applications listed. CONCLUSIONS: Although "Plantae des États-Unis" is a brief collection of annotations, these data reveal a historical scenario of outstanding plants with social and economic interest in the USA at the beginning of the nineteenth century. The data highlight a clear process of suppression of the traditional knowledge of Native North American Indigenous peoples in past historical records and literature, due to the lack of acknowledgment by white European settlers and American-born explorers. This ethnobotanical inventory may help us understand the relationship between plants and Native North American Indigenous peoples, as well as European naturalists and settlers, and USA-born people in the past, and reflect on the importance of Indigenous traditional knowledge, bioeconomy, sustainable management, and conservation of biodiversity in the present and future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The manuscript mentioned 28 species in 15 botanical families.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
species distributed in 15 botanical familiese0
Value
28 speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“In the manuscript are mentioned 28 species distributed in 15 botanical families”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1359–1438 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fagaceae was the most represented family with nine Quercus species.

Taxon
FagaceaeFagaceaee0
Outcome
most representativee0
Value
9 Quercus speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“with Fagaceae (9 Quercus species) being the most representative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1503 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All identified species were USA natives except one undetermined Corylus.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
USA nativese0
Qualifier
one undetermined speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“All species are USA natives, except for one undetermined species (only the genus was mentioned, Corylus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1609 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four species were recorded as medicinal.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
medicinale0
Value
Four speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Four species were directly mentioned as medicinal (Toxicodendron radicans, Liriodendron tulipifera, Actaea racemosa, and Gillenia stipulata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1611–1751 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four species were recorded as tanning agents.

Taxon
foure0
Outcome
tanning agentse0
Value
foure0

Verbatim

e0

“other four were described as tanning agents (astringent) (Cornus florida, Diospyros virginiana, Quercus rubra, and Quercus velutina)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1759–1891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two species were recorded as bitter.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
bittere0
Value
Two speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Two species were described as bitter (Xanthorhiza simplicissima and A. racemosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–1973 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five Quercus species were described as the most useful for cultivation in Europe.

Taxon
QuercusQuercuse0
Outcome
most useful oaks for cultivation in Europee0
Value
fivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus
Quercus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)WikiVagant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“five were reported as the most useful oaks for cultivation in Europe (Quercus bicolor, Quercus castanea, Quercus virginiana, Quercus michauxii, and Quercus alba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2016–2177 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three Quercus species were recorded as used for ship construction.

Taxon
Q.e0
Outcome
used for ship constructione0
Value
threee0

Verbatim

e0

“three of them were used for ship construction (Q. virginiana, Q. michauxii, and Q. alba)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2179–2267 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercus phellos was recorded as having poor quality wood.

Taxon
Quercus phellosQuercus phellose0
Outcome
wood of poor qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus phellos
Quercus phellos · TaxonBerean Hunter · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one had wood of poor quality (Quercus phellos)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2319–2365 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrastis canadensis was recorded as a yellow dye.

Taxon
Hydrastis canadensisHydrastis canadensise0
Outcome
yellow dyee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hydrastis canadensis
Hydrastis canadensis · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One species was described as a yellow dye (Hydrastis canadensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2367–2431 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aesculus pavia was recorded as toxic.

Taxon
Aesculus paviaAesculus paviae0
Outcome
toxice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aesculus pavia
Aesculus pavia · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the other was mentioned as toxic (Aesculus pavia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2437–2486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten species had no useful applications listed.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
did not have any useful applications listede0
Value
Ten speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Ten species did not have any useful applications listed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2488–2543 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The manuscript lacked acknowledgment of Indigenous traditional knowledge.

Outcome
suppression of the traditional knowledgee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The data highlight a clear process of suppression of the traditional knowledge of Native North American Indigenous peoples in past historical records and literature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2781–2945 · show in text ↑