Paper · 2024 · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International

Effect of Tillage Practices and Hydrogel Applications on Yield and Yield Attributing Traits of Maize (Zea mays L.) over the Years

Rajanikanth E; Manjulatha, G; Sravani D; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different tillage practices and hydrogel applications on maize yield in sandy loam soils at the Agricultural Research Station, Karimnagar, PJTSAU, Telangana state over a period of four years (2015-2018) during the Kharif season. The experiment was designed as a split plot with four main treatments i.e., Conventional tillage (CT), Conventional tillage with residue mulching (4 t/ha), Zero tillage (ZT) and Zero tillage with residue mulching (4 t/ha). These were combined with three sub-treatments involving hydrogel application i.e., Control (no hydrogel), Hydrogel at 2.5 kg/ha and Hydrogel at 5.0 kg/ha. The study was replicated three times to ensure reliability of the results. The combination of zero tillage with residue mulching yielded the highest maize grain yield (4435 kg/ha). This suggests that this practice is more effective in retaining soil moisture, which is critical under rainfed conditions. The addition of hydrogel, regardless of the rate (2.5 kg/ha or 5.0 kg/ha), did not lead to any significant improvement in maize yield. The use of zero tillage combined with residue mulching is beneficial for maize production in sandy loam soils under rainfed conditions, primarily due to enhanced moisture retention. However, hydrogel application did not provide any additional yield benefits in this context.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue mulching gave the highest maize grain yield, 4435 kg/ha

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayst0
Treatment
zero tillage with residue mulchinge1
Outcome
maize grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4435 kg/hae1
Comparator
Conventional tillage (CT)e2
Setting
Karimnagar, PJTSAU, Telangana statee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 · show in text ↑
e0

“maize yield in sandy loam soils at the Agricultural Research Station, Karimnagar, PJTSAU, Telangana state”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 96–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of zero tillage with residue mulching yielded the highest maize grain yield (4435 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–825 · show in text ↑
e2

“Conventional tillage (CT), Conventional tillage with residue mulching (4 t/ha), Zero tillage (ZT) and Zero tillage with residue mulching (4 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel at 2.5 or 5.0 kg/ha did not significantly improve maize yield compared with no hydrogel

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayst0
Treatment
addition of hydrogele3
Outcome
maize yielde3
Direction
did not lead to any significant improvemente3
Comparator
Control (no hydrogel)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“The addition of hydrogel, regardless of the rate (2.5 kg/ha or 5.0 kg/ha), did not lead to any significant improvement in maize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1083 · show in text ↑
e4

“Control (no hydrogel), Hydrogel at 2.5 kg/ha and Hydrogel at 5.0 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–644 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage with residue mulching is more effective in retaining soil moisture, which the authors link to the yield gain

Taxon
Zea mays L.Zea mayst0
Treatment
zero tillage with residue mulchinge1
Outcome
retaining soil moisturee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The combination of zero tillage with residue mulching yielded the highest maize grain yield (4435 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–825 · show in text ↑
e5

“This suggests that this practice is more effective in retaining soil moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–904 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage combined with residue mulching is beneficial for maize production in sandy loam soils under rainfed conditions

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Treatment
zero tillage combined with residue mulchinge6
Outcome
maize productione6
Setting
sandy loam soils under rainfed conditionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The use of zero tillage combined with residue mulching is beneficial for maize production in sandy loam soils under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1219 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

253 papers: 221 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 221 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

249 papers more in this group

See all 253 papers →

mulching · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

364 papers: 330 positive, 34 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Without nitrogen in the wet year, mulched plots yielded much less.

    Effect of a Killed Sod Mulch on Nitrate Movement and Corn Yield1 · 1973 · compared with conventionally‐tilled no nitrogen treatment

    Opposite direction

360 papers more in this group

See all 364 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.