Paper · 2024 · Agronomy for Sustainable Development

Beneficial soil fungi enhance tomato crop productivity and resistance to the leaf-mining pest Tuta absoluta in agronomic conditions

Zhivko Minchev; Beatriz Ramírez-Serrano; Laura Dejana; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Research has shown that soil-borne beneficial microorganisms can enhance plant growth, productivity, and resistance against pests and pathogens and could thus serve as a sustainable alternative to agrochemicals. To date, however, the effect of soil-beneficial microbes under commercial crop production has been little assessed. We here investigated the effect of root inoculation with nine well-characterized bacterial and fungal strains and two consortia on tomato performance under intensive tomato crop management practices. We measured the impact of these root inoculations on plant growth, fruit quality, yield, and pest and pathogen incidence. While most microbial strains showed weak effects, we found that the fungal strains Trichoderma afroharzianum T22 and Funneliformis mosseae significantly increased marketable tomato yield. Moreover, we found that inoculation with most of the fungal strains led to a significant reduction in the incidence of the devastating leaf-mining pest Tuta absoluta , while this effect was not observed for bacterial inoculants. In addition, we found that microbial inoculations did not impact the incidence of introduced natural pest enemies, supporting their compatibility with well-established integrated pest management strategies in horticulture. In summary, the observed general positive effects of soil microbes on tomato yield and resistance reinforce the move toward broader adoption of microbial inoculants in future crop production, ultimately improving agricultural sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal strain Trichoderma afroharzianum T22 significantly increased marketable tomato yield.

Treatment
Trichoderma afroharzianum T22e0
Interactor
Trichoderma afroharzianum T22Trichoderma afroharzianume0symbiont
Outcome
marketable tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungal strains Trichoderma afroharzianum T22 and Funneliformis mosseae significantly increased marketable tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungal strain Funneliformis mosseae significantly increased marketable tomato yield.

Treatment
Funneliformis mosseaee0
Interactor
Funneliformis mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
marketable tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the fungal strains Trichoderma afroharzianum T22 and Funneliformis mosseae significantly increased marketable tomato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of tomato with most of the fungal strains significantly reduced the incidence of the leaf-mining pest Tuta absoluta.

Treatment
inoculation with most of the fungal strainse0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with most of the fungal strains led to a significant reduction in the incidence of the devastating leaf-mining pest Tuta absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction in Tuta absoluta incidence was not observed for bacterial inoculants in tomato.

Treatment
bacterial inoculantse0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
incidencee0
Direction
not observede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with most of the fungal strains led to a significant reduction in the incidence of the devastating leaf-mining pest Tuta absoluta , while this effect was not observed for bacterial inoculants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1074 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculations did not impact the incidence of introduced natural pest enemies in tomato.

Treatment
microbial inoculationse0
Interactor
natural pest enemiese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of introduced natural pest enemiese0
Direction
did not impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial inoculations did not impact the incidence of introduced natural pest enemies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–36 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

266 papers: 136 positive, 130 negative or no effect

129 papers in the same direction as this paper · 136 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

262 papers more in this group

See all 266 papers →

inoculation · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.