Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Co-inoculation of cyanobacteria, rhizobia, and azospirilla associated with fertilizer N increases the common bean grain yield

Eduardo Hélder Horácio; Thiago Montagner Souza; Poliana Catarino; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A large number of beneficial microorganisms have been used as inoculants in agriculture to increase grain yield. The objective of the study was to evaluate the response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to inoculation and co-inoculation with rhizobia, azospirilla and cyanobacteria combined with doses of N-fertilizer. A field experiment was carried out in two growing seasons to assess twelve treatments using single and combined inoculation of rhizobia (Rhizobium tropici + R. freirei), Azospirillum brasilense, Anabaena cylindrica, and Calothrix brevissima, and application of 30 and 60 kg N kg ha−1 as topdressing in a factorial design. A control without N-mineral and inoculation was included. Co-inoculation of common bean (cv. IPR Curió) using A. cylindrica, C. brevissima with rhizobia, and A. brasilense, with the application of 30 kg N ha−1 in topdressing increases grain yields. Regardless of the growing season and the N dose, the dual inoculation of rhizobia and C. brevissima stood out in the increase of grain yield concerning the control without inoculation, showing that it is an efficient agronomic practice for common bean under tropical conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation with A. cylindrica, C. brevissima, rhizobia and A. brasilense plus 30 kg N ha−1 increased common bean grain yield.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise0
Material
cv. IPR Curióe0
Treatment
Co-inoculation of common bean (cv. IPR Curió) using A. cylindrica, C. brevissima with rhizobia, and A. brasilense, with the application of 30 kg N ha−1 in topdressinge0
Interactor
A. cylindricaAnabaena cylindricae0symbiont
Second interactor
C. brevissimaCalothrix brevissimae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
rhizobia, and A. brasilensee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Co-inoculation of common bean (cv. IPR Curió) using A. cylindrica, C. brevissima with rhizobia, and A. brasilense, with the application of 30 kg N ha−1 in topdressing increases grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual rhizobia and C. brevissima inoculation increased common bean grain yield versus uninoculated control across seasons and N doses.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
dual inoculation of rhizobia and C. brevissimae0
Interactor
C. brevissimaCalothrix brevissimae0symbiont
Second interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
Regardless of the growing season and the N dosee0
Comparator
control without inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of the growing season and the N dose, the dual inoculation of rhizobia and C. brevissima stood out in the increase of grain yield concerning the control without inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–113 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

152 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.