Paper · 2020 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Response of Dry Bean to Nitrogen Fertilization and Inoculation with Rhizobium Tropici and Azospirillum Brasiliensis

Nilson Darlan Vieira; Adônis Moreira; Larissa A. C. Moraes; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) has significant economic importance in Brazil and is one of the most important sources of income, especially for small producers. This study aimed to evaluate the response of dry bean to different nitrogen (N) sources, using a completely randomized design, with five replicates. Treatments comprised five N sources [ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4], calcium nitrate [Ca(NO3)2], potassium nitrate (KNO3), ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3), and urea] applied at 300 mg kg−1 N plus three additional treatments (inoculation with Rhizobium tropici, inoculation with R. tropici plus Azospirillum brasiliensis, and the control without N and inoculation). The yield components [grain yield (GY), shoot dry weight yield (SDWY), number of pods per pot (NPP), number of grains per pot (NGPt), pod weight (PW), and number of grains per pod (NGP)], and physiological components [water use efficiency (WUE), photosynthetic rate (A), and stomatal conductance (gs)] were evaluated. Inoculation with R. tropici and R. tropici plus A. brasiliensis did not induce significant effects on yield components when compared to those of the control. (NH4)2SO4 did not change the performance of most quantified yield components, whereas NH4NO3 showed increases in GY, SDWY, NPP, NGP, and PW as well as in WUE. KNO3 and Ca(NO3)2 resulted in increased performance of GY, SDWY, NPP, A, and gs compared to that in the control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensis. The amide source via urea showed the greatest increase in GY, with 56.5% more than that in the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium tropici inoculation did not significantly alter bean yield components versus control.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
Inoculation with R. tropicie0
Interactor
R. tropiciMartinezella tropicie0symbiont
Outcome
yield componentse0
Direction
did not induce significant effectse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Martinezella tropici
Martinezella tropici · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with R. tropici and R. tropici plus A. brasiliensis did not induce significant effects on yield components when compared to those of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Rhizobium and Azospirillum inoculation did not significantly alter yield components versus control.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
R. tropici plus A. brasiliensise0
Interactor
R. tropiciMartinezella tropicie0symbiont
Second interactor
A. brasiliensise0symbiont
Outcome
yield componentse0
Direction
did not induce significant effectse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Martinezella tropici
Martinezella tropici · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with R. tropici and R. tropici plus A. brasiliensis did not induce significant effects on yield components when compared to those of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium sulfate did not change most measured yield components.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
(NH4)2SO4e0
Outcome
most quantified yield componentse0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“(NH4)2SO4 did not change the performance of most quantified yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate increased grain yield, shoot dry weight, pod number, grain number, and pod weight.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
NH4NO3e0
Outcome
GY, SDWY, NPP, NGP, and PWe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“NH4NO3 showed increases in GY, SDWY, NPP, NGP, and PW as well as in WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate increased water use efficiency.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
NH4NO3e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“NH4NO3 showed increases in GY, SDWY, NPP, NGP, and PW as well as in WUE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium nitrate increased grain yield, shoot weight, pod number, photosynthesis, and stomatal conductance versus controls and inoculants.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
KNO3e0
Outcome
GY, SDWY, NPPe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensise0

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 and Ca(NO3)2 resulted in increased performance of GY, SDWY, NPP, A, and gs compared to that in the control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium nitrate increased photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance versus controls and inoculants.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
KNO3e0
Outcome
A, and gse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensise0

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 and Ca(NO3)2 resulted in increased performance of GY, SDWY, NPP, A, and gs compared to that in the control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate increased grain yield, shoot weight, and pod number versus controls and inoculants.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
Ca(NO3)2e0
Outcome
GY, SDWY, NPPe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensise0

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 and Ca(NO3)2 resulted in increased performance of GY, SDWY, NPP, A, and gs compared to that in the control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate increased photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance versus controls and inoculants.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
Ca(NO3)2e0
Outcome
A, and gse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensise0

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 and Ca(NO3)2 resulted in increased performance of GY, SDWY, NPP, A, and gs compared to that in the control treatment and the isolated inoculant and its combination with A. brasiliensis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea produced the greatest grain yield increase, 56.5% above control.

Taxon
dry beant0
Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
greatest increasee0
Value
56.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“The amide source via urea showed the greatest increase in GY, with 56.5% more than that in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1602 · show in text ↑
t0

“Dry Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Martinezella tropici · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

potassium nitrate · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

152 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 153 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.