Paper · 2024 · Plants

Meeting the Demand for Different Nitrogen Forms in Potato Plants Without the Use of Nitrification Inhibitors

Yangyang Chen; Yangyang Chen; Xiaohua Shi; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The preference of potato plants for specific nitrogen (N) form changes with growth stage. Potato plants prefer nitrate N before tuber formation, while they favor ammonium N after tuber formation. However, few studies have focused on N species management in potato production. In this study, 2-year field experiments were conducted from 2020 to 2021 in Inner Mongolia, China, under drip irrigation with four N treatments: (1) CK (no N was used), (2) conventional farming practices (F) (urea was the only N source applied for potato growth), (3) nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and ammonium N with nitrification inhibitor supplied after tuber formation (N-NI), and (4) nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formation (Opt). The results demonstrated that, compared with the F, the Opt treatment facilitated potato N uptake, with a 33-40% increase in plant N accumulation, and significantly increased potato growth, which ultimately resulted in a yield increase of 12-20% and an increase of 11-22 percentage units in NUE. In addition, the Opt treatment reduced the soil N residual by ~14% after harvest. Compared with the N-NI, the Opt treatment did not result in a decrease in tuber yield or NUE. Therefore, supplying nitrate N before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N after tuber formation can result in a better match between the supply and demand of potato plants for N forms without the use of nitrification inhibitors, improving both potato yield and NUE, which is of substantial agronomic and environmental value.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Opt treatment increased potato plant N accumulation by 33-40% compared with the F treatment.

Treatment
nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formatione1
Outcome
plant N accumulatione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33-40%e0
Comparator
the Fe0
Setting
Inner Mongolia, Chinae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the F, the Opt treatment facilitated potato N uptake, with a 33-40% increase in plant N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formation (Opt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–788 · show in text ↑
e2

“2-year field experiments were conducted from 2020 to 2021 in Inner Mongolia, China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Opt treatment significantly increased potato growth compared with the F treatment.

Treatment
nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formatione2
Outcome
potato growthe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
the Fe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the F, the Opt treatment facilitated potato N uptake, with a 33-40% increase in plant N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly increased potato growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–978 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formation (Opt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Opt treatment increased potato tuber yield by 12-20% compared with the F treatment.

Treatment
nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formatione2
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
12-20%e1
Comparator
the Fe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the F, the Opt treatment facilitated potato N uptake, with a 33-40% increase in plant N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“resulted in a yield increase of 12-20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1035 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formation (Opt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Opt treatment increased nitrogen use efficiency by 11-22 percentage units compared with the F treatment.

Treatment
nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formatione2
Outcome
NUEe1
Direction
increasee1
Value
11-22 percentage unitse1
Comparator
the Fe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the F, the Opt treatment facilitated potato N uptake, with a 33-40% increase in plant N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“an increase of 11-22 percentage units in NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1084 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formation (Opt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Opt treatment reduced soil N residual by about 14 percent after harvest.

Treatment
nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formatione2
Outcome
soil N residuale1
Direction
reducede1
Value
~14%e1
Qualifier
after harveste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the F, the Opt treatment facilitated potato N uptake, with a 33-40% increase in plant N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“the Opt treatment reduced the soil N residual by ~14% after harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1166 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrate N supplied before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N applied after tuber formation (Opt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Opt treatment did not decrease tuber yield or NUE compared with the N-NI treatment.

Treatment
Opt treatmente1
Outcome
tuber yield or NUEe1
Direction
did not result in a decreasee1
Comparator
N-NIe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the F, the Opt treatment facilitated potato N uptake, with a 33-40% increase in plant N accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–935 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with the N-NI, the Opt treatment did not result in a decrease in tuber yield or NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1260 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Supplying nitrate N before tuber formation and frequent low-dose ammonium N after it is recommended to improve potato yield and NUE without nitrification inhibitors.

Treatment
supplying nitrate N before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N after tuber formatione0
Outcome
improving both potato yield and NUEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplying nitrate N before tuber formation and frequent, low-dose ammonium N after tuber formation can result in a better match between the supply and demand of potato plants for N forms without the use of nitrification inhibitors, improving both potato yield and NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1540 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

132 papers: 109 positive, 23 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

128 papers more in this group

See all 132 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 24 positive, 9 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 38 positive, 13 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
    Low biomass genotypes increased root development under nitrogen deficiency stress.

    In vitro method for early evaluation of nitrogen use efficiency associated traits in potato · 2014 · compared with full nitrogen availability

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.