Paper · 2024 · Journal of Applied Microbiology

Inoculation with PGPR co-fermented broths promotes growth, yields, and quality of pepper by increasing soil nutrients and changing soil bacterial community

Yujie Han; Lei Tian; Yu Luo; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

AIMS: The purpose of this study was to explore impacts of different combinations of co-fermentation plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) broth on the growth and yield of pepper. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effects of co-fermentation broth containing a random combination of two PGPR strains on the growth of pepper were analyzed. All inoculation treatments promoted growth, yield, and quality of peppers. The relative abundance of the dominant Proteobacteria and Sphingomonas was significantly higher in the planted soil at the seedling and fruiting stages, and the soil available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents were correspondingly higher. In addition, the co-fermented broth of Bacillus velezensis HP9 and Burkholderia pyrrocinia P10 treatment had the most pronounced effect on plant growth, while the combination of Bacillus flexus HGD12 and P10 had the greatest impact on fruit nutritional indices. This is consistent with the highest enrichment of beneficial bacterial genera at the seedling stage in the HP9 and P10 treatment and at the fruiting stage in the P10 and HGD12 treatment groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Different combinations of co-fermented bacterial broths increased soil nutrient contents and changed the bacterial community, which in turn promoted the growth, yield, and quality of pepper.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All inoculation treatments promoted pepper growth, yield and quality.

Taxon
peppersCapsicume0
Treatment
inoculation treatmentse0
Outcome
growth, yield, and qualitye0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All inoculation treatments promoted growth, yield, and quality of peppers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria abundance was significantly higher in planted soil at seedling and fruiting stages.

Taxon
peppert0
Organ / stage
seedling and fruiting stagese0
Interactor
ProteobacteriaPseudomonadotae0symbiont
Outcome
relative abundancee0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“relative abundance of the dominant Proteobacteria and Sphingomonas was significantly higher in the planted soil at the seedling and fruiting stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sphingomonas abundance was significantly higher in planted soil at seedling and fruiting stages.

Taxon
peppert0
Organ / stage
seedling and fruiting stagese0
Interactor
SphingomonasSphingomonase0symbiont
Outcome
relative abundancee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sphingomonas
Sphingomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alan Rockefeller · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative abundance of the dominant Proteobacteria and Sphingomonas was significantly higher in the planted soil at the seedling and fruiting stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium were higher.

Taxon
peppert0
Outcome
soil available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contentse0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“soil available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents were correspondingly higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus velezensis HP9 with Burkholderia pyrrocinia P10 had the strongest plant growth effect.

Taxon
peppert0
Treatment
co-fermented broth of Bacillus velezensis HP9 and Burkholderia pyrrocinia P10 treatmente0
Interactor
Bacillus velezensis HP9Bacillus velezensise0symbiont
Second interactor
Burkholderia pyrrocinia P10Burkholderia pyrrociniae0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
most pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus velezensis
Bacillus velezensis · InteractorMarinka Pavlova · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co-fermented broth of Bacillus velezensis HP9 and Burkholderia pyrrocinia P10 treatment had the most pronounced effect on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus flexus HGD12 with P10 had the greatest effect on fruit nutrition.

Taxon
peppert0
Treatment
combination of Bacillus flexus HGD12 and P10e0
Interactor
Bacillus flexus HGD12Priestia flexae0symbiont
Second interactor
P10e0symbiont
Outcome
fruit nutritional indicese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Priestia flexa
Priestia flexa · InteractorDr. Sahay · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of Bacillus flexus HGD12 and P10 had the greatest impact on fruit nutritional indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beneficial bacterial genera were most enriched at seedling stage under HP9 and P10.

Taxon
peppert0
Organ / stage
seedling stagee0
Treatment
HP9 and P10 treatmente0
Outcome
beneficial bacterial generae0
Direction
highest enrichmente0

Verbatim

e0

“highest enrichment of beneficial bacterial genera at the seedling stage in the HP9 and P10 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beneficial bacterial genera were most enriched at fruiting under P10 and HGD12.

Taxon
peppert0
Organ / stage
fruiting stagee0
Treatment
P10 and HGD12 treatment groupse0
Outcome
beneficial bacterial generae1
Direction
highest enrichmente1

Verbatim

e0

“at the fruiting stage in the P10 and HGD12 treatment groups”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest enrichment of beneficial bacterial genera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–998 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different co-fermented broths changed soil nutrients and bacterial communities, which the authors linked to pepper performance.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
co-fermented bacterial brothse0
Outcome
growth, yield, and quality of peppere0
Qualifier
increased soil nutrient contents and changed the bacterial communitye0

Verbatim

e0

“Different combinations of co-fermented bacterial broths increased soil nutrient contents and changed the bacterial community, which in turn promoted the growth, yield, and quality of pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1331 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: general · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.