Paper · 2024 · Geoderma

Hairy vetch influence on nitrous oxide and nitrate leaching losses during corn growing seasons in reduced and no-till systems

Ashani Thilakarathne; Madhabi Tiwari; Oladapo Adeyemi; et al.

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Shifting from reduced tillage (RT) to no-till (NT) often reduces phosphorus (P) runoff by minimizing soil erosion. However, it might increase nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions or nitrate-N (NO 3 -N) leaching. Including a legume cover crop such as hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa L.) before corn ( Zea mays L.) is a common practice among growers in the Midwest USA. However, the effects of hairy vetch following soybean ( Glycine max L.) harvest on NO 3 -N leaching and N 2 O emissions during the following corn season in soil with clay and fragipans are less assessed. This study evaluated the influence of cover crop (hairy vetch vs. no-CC control) and tillage systems (NT vs. RT) when 179 kg ha −1 nitrogen (N) was applied at planting on (i) corn yield, N uptake, removal, and balance; (ii) N 2 O emissions and NO 3 -N leaching; (iii) yield-scaled N 2 O emissions and NO 3 -N leaching during two corn growing seasons. We also evaluated factors influencing N 2 O emissions and NO 3 -N leaching via principal component analysis. Corn grain yield was higher in RT (8.4 Mg ha −1 ) than NT (6.2 Mg ha −1 ), reflecting more available N in the soil in RT than NT, possibly due to the favorable aeration and increased soil temperature in deeper soil layers resulting from tillage. Hairy vetch increased corn grain yield and soil N. However, it led to higher losses of both N 2 O-N and NO 3 -N, indicating that increased corn grain yield, due to the hairy vetch’s N contribution, also resulted in higher N losses. Yield-scaled N 2 O-N emissions in NT-2019 (3696.4 g N 2 O-N Mg −1 ) were twofold higher than RT-2019 (1872.7 g N 2 O-N Mg −1 ) and almost fourfold higher than NT-2021 and RT-2021 indicating in a wet year like 2019, yield-scaled N 2 O-N emissions were higher in NT than RT. Principal component analysis indicated that NO 3 -N leaching was most correlated with soil N availability and corn grain yield (both positive correlations). In contrast, due to the continued presence of soil N, soil N 2 O-N fluxes were more driven by soil volumetric water content (VWC) with a positive correlation. We conclude that in soils with claypan and fragipans in humid climates, NT is not an effective strategy to decrease N 2 O-N fluxes. Hairy vetch benefits corn grain yield and supplements N but increases N loss through NO 3 -N leaching and N 2 O-N emissions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage produced higher corn yield than no till, 8.4 versus 6.2 Mg ha−1.

Treatment
RTe0
Outcome
Corn grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.4 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
6.2 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn grain yield was higher in RT (8.4 Mg ha −1 ) than NT (6.2 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage had more available soil N than no till.

Treatment
RTe0
Outcome
available N in the soile0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“more available N in the soil in RT than NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch increased corn grain yield.

Treatment
Hairy vetche0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hairy vetch increased corn grain yield and soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch increased soil N.

Treatment
Hairy vetche0
Outcome
soil Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hairy vetch increased corn grain yield and soil N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch raised N2O-N losses.

Treatment
Hairy vetcht0
Outcome
N 2 O-Ne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it led to higher losses of both N 2 O-N and NO 3 -N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hairy vetch influence on nitrous oxide and nitrate leaching losses during corn growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hairy vetch raised NO3-N losses.

Treatment
Hairy vetcht0
Outcome
NO 3 -Ne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it led to higher losses of both N 2 O-N and NO 3 -N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1380 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hairy vetch influence on nitrous oxide and nitrate leaching losses during corn growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield-scaled N2O-N emissions in NT-2019 were twofold higher than RT-2019.

Treatment
NT-2019e0
Outcome
Yield-scaled N 2 O-N emissionse0
Direction
highere0
Value
3696.4 g N 2 O-N Mg −1e0
Qualifier
1872.7 g N 2 O-N Mg −1e0
Comparator
RT-2019e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield-scaled N 2 O-N emissions in NT-2019 (3696.4 g N 2 O-N Mg −1 ) were twofold higher than RT-2019 (1872.7 g N 2 O-N Mg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NT-2019 yield-scaled N2O-N emissions were almost fourfold higher than NT-2021 and RT-2021.

Treatment
no-tillt0
Outcome
fourfold highere0
Direction
highere0
Value
fourfolde0
Comparator
NT-2021 and RT-2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“almost fourfold higher than NT-2021 and RT-2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1679 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn growing seasons in reduced and no-till systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO3-N leaching correlated positively with soil N availability.

Outcome
NO 3 -N leachinge0
Direction
positive correlationse0
Setting
soil N availabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO 3 -N leaching was most correlated with soil N availability and corn grain yield (both positive correlations)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1929 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NO3-N leaching correlated positively with corn grain yield.

Organ / stage
corn graine0
Outcome
NO 3 -N leachinge0
Direction
positive correlationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NO 3 -N leaching was most correlated with soil N availability and corn grain yield (both positive correlations)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–1929 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N2O-N fluxes correlated positively with volumetric water content.

Outcome
soil N 2 O-N fluxese0
Direction
positive correlatione0
Setting
soil volumetric water content (VWC)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil N 2 O-N fluxes were more driven by soil volumetric water content (VWC) with a positive correlation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1985–2088 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude no till is ineffective at decreasing N2O-N fluxes in claypan and fragipan soils.

Outcome
NT is not an effective strategy to decrease N 2 O-N fluxese0
Setting
soils with claypan and fragipans in humid climatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in soils with claypan and fragipans in humid climates, NT is not an effective strategy to decrease N 2 O-N fluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2107–2220 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–94 · show in text ↑

Vicia villosa · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

tillage · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 68 positive, 14 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.