Paper · 2024 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

The shifting in weed diversity and dominance in several weed management and soil tillage techniques in maize plantation

Nursa’adah; W Akasah

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Nowadays, herbicides are 60% of volume pesticides used worldwide. The large-scale agricultural production systems mostly depend on artificial chemicals to manage weeds. One strategy to reduce the herbicide use without reducing productivity is integrated weed control. Cover crop (CC) is one way of integrated weed control by suppressing the emergence of weeds. This study aims to examine the shifting in weed diversity and dominance in several weed management and soil tillages techniques in maize plantation. This study used a Randomized Block Design with 2 factorials. The first factor was weed management techniques (P), with levels: no control (P0), cover crop (P1), pre-emergent herbicide (P2), post-emergent herbicide (P3), and weed-free (with weeding) (P4). And the second factor was soil tillage technique (T), namely: no tillage (T0) and conventional tillage (T1). Vegetation analysis was conducted to the relative density (RD), relative frequency (RF), and summed dominance ratio (SDR). The results showed that there was a decrease in the number of weed species from 25 species before treatments to 21 species after treatments. The most effective reduction in the number of species and weed density occurred in the treatment of using pre-emergent herbicides with a combination of tillage techniques.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed species number fell from 25 before treatment to 21 afterward in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Interactor
weed speciese0weed
Outcome
number of weed speciese0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
21 speciese0
Qualifier
25 species before treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was a decrease in the number of weed species from 25 species before treatments to 21 species after treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergent herbicide with tillage most effectively reduced weed species number and density.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
pre-emergent herbicides with a combination of tillage techniquese0
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
number of species and weed densitye0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
no controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The most effective reduction in the number of species and weed density occurred in the treatment of using pre-emergent herbicides with a combination of tillage techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1317 · show in text ↑
e1

“no control (P0), cover crop (P1), pre-emergent herbicide (P2), post-emergent herbicide (P3), and weed-free (with weeding) (P4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–772 · show in text ↑
e2

“weed density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1217 · show in text ↑

tillage · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 65 positive, 46 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.