Paper · 2024 · PLANT ARCHIVES

EFFECT OF FOLIAR SPRAY OF MICRONUTRIENTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF GREENGRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L. WILCZEK)

Satyarth Gupta; Bineeta M. Bara; G.M. Lal

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

during the Kharif season 2022-2023 with a to evaluate the effect of micro-nutrients treatments combination on seed yield & its attributing characters of green gram.The experimental material for present investigation comprised of 10 treatments of micronutrients combination applied in green gram variety IPM-205-7.The experimentation was laid out in Randomised Block Design (RBD) with three replications.The treatment comprised of T 0 (RDF + Water spray (Control); T 1 (RDF + Fe @ 0.5%); T 2 (RDF + Zn @ 0.5%); T 3 (RDF + Mn @ 0.5%); T 4 (RDF + B @ 0.5%); T 5 (RDF + Mo @ 0.5%); T 6 (RDF + Fe @ 0.5% + Zn @ 0.5%); T 7 (RDF + Fe @ 0.5% + Zn @ 0.5% + Mn @ 0.5%); T 8 (RDF + Co @ 0.5%) and T 9 (RDF + Mixture of all micronutrients @ 0.5%).Spraying of micronutrients was done at 30 days after sowing.From the present investigation it is concluded that among 10 treatment combination of foliar spray of nutrients applied in green gram on the basis of mean performance T 9 (RDF+ Mixture of all micronutrients @ 0.5%) performed best in terms of yield parameters like number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, seed yield per plant, seed index.It was second highest in harvest index and second most early in flowering and maturing.Therefore, combination used in T 9 i.e., RDF + Mixture of all micronutrients @ 0.5% can be promoted to use to get better yield and overcome low productivity in green gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 performed best for pods per plant, seeds per pod, seed yield per plant and seed index.

Treatment
T 9 (RDF+ Mixture of all micronutrients @ 0.5%)e0
Outcome
number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, seed yield per plant, seed indexe0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T 9 (RDF+ Mixture of all micronutrients @ 0.5%) performed best in terms of yield parameters like number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, seed yield per plant, seed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREENGRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L. WILCZEK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–100 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.