Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of nano urea on growth and yield attributes of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]

Parth Acharya; NS Solanki; Jeevidha Kunwar Gehlot; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment entitled “Effect of nano urea on growth, yield and quality of Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.)]” was conducted at School of Agricultural Sciences, JRNRVU Dabok, Udaipur during rabi seasons at 2023-24 to study the effect of nano urea on growth, yield and quality of Indian mustard. The experiment consisting ten treatments- T1 (control), T2 (100% RDN), T3 (75% RDN), T4 (50% RDN), T5 (50% RDN + Nano urea 2ml l-1 ), T6 (50% RDN + Nano urea 4ml l-1 ), T7 (50% RDN + Nano urea 6ml l-1 ), T8 (75% RDN + Nano urea 2ml l-1 ), T9 (75% RDN + Nano urea 4ml l-1 ) and T10 (75% RDN + Nano urea 6ml l-1 ). These treatments were evaluated under randomized block design with three replication. Treatment T10 (75% RDN + Nano urea 6ml l-1 ) significantly increase plant height at 30 DAS and 60 DAS, dry matter accumulation at 30 DAS, 60 DAS, 90 DAS and at harvest, number of branches plant-1 , number of siliqua plant-1 , number of seed siliqua-1 , length of siliqua, 1000-seed weight, respectively. The application of 75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1 resulted in significant increase in seed yield (1995 kg ha-1 ) by 33.0% and 17.2% over T1 (control) and T3 (75% RDN) but was at par with T2 (100% RDN). Similar trends were observed with stover yield and biological yield. However, it did not cause any significant increase in secondary branches plant-1 and harvest index (%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 significantly increased plant height and dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]Brassica junceat0
Treatment
75% RDN + Nano urea 6ml l-1e0
Outcome
plant height at 30 DAS and 60 DAS, dry matter accumulation at 30 DAS, 60 DAS, 90 DAS and at harveste0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T10 (75% RDN + Nano urea 6ml l-1 ) significantly increase plant height at 30 DAS and 60 DAS, dry matter accumulation at 30 DAS, 60 DAS, 90 DAS and at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 significantly increased branch, siliqua and seed counts, siliqua length and 1000-seed weight.

Taxon
Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]Brassica junceat0
Treatment
75% RDN + Nano urea 6ml l-1e0
Outcome
number of branches plant-1 , number of siliqua plant-1 , number of seed siliqua-1 , length of siliqua, 1000-seed weighte0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T10 (75% RDN + Nano urea 6ml l-1 ) significantly increase plant height at 30 DAS and 60 DAS, dry matter accumulation at 30 DAS, 60 DAS, 90 DAS and at harvest, number of branches plant-1 , number of siliqua plant-1 , number of seed siliqua-1 , length of siliqua, 1000-seed weight, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 increased seed yield to 1995 kg ha-1, 33.0% over control.

Taxon
Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]Brassica junceat0
Treatment
75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1995 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
33.0%e0
Comparator
T1 (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1 resulted in significant increase in seed yield (1995 kg ha-1 ) by 33.0% and 17.2% over T1 (control) and T3 (75% RDN) but was at par with T2 (100% RDN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 increased seed yield 17.2% over T3.

Taxon
Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]Brassica junceat0
Treatment
75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.2%e0
Comparator
T3 (75% RDN)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1 resulted in significant increase in seed yield (1995 kg ha-1 ) by 33.0% and 17.2% over T1 (control) and T3 (75% RDN) but was at par with T2 (100% RDN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 seed yield was at par with T2.

Taxon
Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]Brassica junceat0
Treatment
75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
T2 (100% RDN)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1 resulted in significant increase in seed yield (1995 kg ha-1 ) by 33.0% and 17.2% over T1 (control) and T3 (75% RDN) but was at par with T2 (100% RDN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stover and biological yields showed similar trends to seed yield.

Taxon
Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]Brassica junceat0
Treatment
75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1e0
Outcome
stover yield and biological yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1 resulted in significant increase in seed yield (1995 kg ha-1 ) by 33.0% and 17.2% over T1 (control) and T3 (75% RDN) but was at par with T2 (100% RDN). Similar trends were observed with stover yield and biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 caused no significant increase in secondary branches and harvest index.

Taxon
Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]Brassica junceat0
Treatment
75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1e0
Outcome
secondary branches plant-1 and harvest index (%)e0
Direction
did not cause any significant increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 75% RDN with nano urea 6ml l-1 resulted in significant increase in seed yield (1995 kg ha-1 ) by 33.0% and 17.2% over T1 (control) and T3 (75% RDN) but was at par with T2 (100% RDN). Similar trends were observed with stover yield and biological yield. However, it did not cause any significant increase in secondary branches plant-1 and harvest index (%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Indian mustard [Brassica juncea L.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–89 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

65 papers: 63 positive, 2 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.