Paper · 2024 · Plants

Effects of Drought Stress at the Booting Stage on Leaf Physiological Characteristics and Yield of Rice

Xiaolong Yang; Xiuxiu Wang; Yang Li; et al.

16
claims
16
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

L.) production worldwide. In this study, we investigated the effects of drought stress at the booting stage on rice leaf physiological characteristics and yield. The results showed that drought stress would lead to a significant decrease in chlorophyll content and photosynthesis in rice leaves, which would affect rice yield. Three different rice varieties were used in this study, namely Hanyou73 (HY73), Huanghuazhan (HHZ), and IRAT109. Under drought stress, the chlorophyll content of all cultivars decreased significantly: 11.1% and 32.2% decreases in chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b in HHZ cultivars, 14.1% and 28.5% decreases in IRAT109 cultivars, and 22.9% and 18.6% decreases in HY73 cultivars, respectively. In addition, drought stress also led to a significant decrease in leaf water potential, a significant increase in antioxidant enzyme activity, and an increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) content, suggesting that rice activated a defense mechanism to cope with drought-induced oxidative stress. This study also found that drought stress significantly reduced the net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of rice, which, in turn, affected the yield of rice. Under drought stress, the yield of the HHZ cultivars decreased most significantly, reaching 30.2%, while the yields of IRAT109 and HY73 cultivars decreased by 13.0% and 18.2%, respectively. The analysis of yield composition showed that the number of grains per panicle, seed-setting rate, and 1000-grain weight were the key factors affecting yield formation. A correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between yield and net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, chla/chlb ratio, Rubisco activity, and Fv/Fm, but there was a negative correlation with MDA and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). In summary, the effects of drought stress on rice yield are multifaceted, involving changes in multiple agronomic traits. The results highlight the importance of selecting and nurturing rice varieties with a high drought tolerance, which should have efficient antioxidant systems and high photosynthetic efficiency. Future research should focus on the genetic mechanisms of these physiological responses in order to develop molecular markers to assist in the breeding of drought-tolerant rice varieties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced chlorophyll a in HHZ by 11.1%.

Material
HHZe0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
11.1%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought stress, the chlorophyll content of all cultivars decreased significantly: 11.1% and 32.2% decreases in chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b in HHZ cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced chlorophyll b in HHZ by 32.2%.

Material
HHZe0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll be0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
32.2%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under drought stress, the chlorophyll content of all cultivars decreased significantly: 11.1% and 32.2% decreases in chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b in HHZ cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–605 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced chlorophyll a in IRAT109 by 14.1%.

Material
IRAT109e0
Outcome
decreasese0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
14.1%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“14.1% and 28.5% decreases in IRAT109 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced chlorophyll b in IRAT109 by 28.5%.

Material
IRAT109e0
Outcome
decreasese0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
28.5%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“14.1% and 28.5% decreases in IRAT109 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced chlorophyll a in HY73 by 22.9%.

Material
HY73e0
Outcome
decreasese0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
22.9%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“22.9% and 18.6% decreases in HY73 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced chlorophyll b in HY73 by 18.6%.

Material
HY73e0
Outcome
decreasese0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
18.6%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“22.9% and 18.6% decreases in HY73 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased leaf water potential.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
leaf water potentiale0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress also led to a significant decrease in leaf water potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased antioxidant enzyme activity.

Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“a significant increase in antioxidant enzyme activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased MDA content.

Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in malondialdehyde (MDA) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–909 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress significantly reduced the net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced HHZ yield by 30.2%.

Material
HHZe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
30.2%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of the HHZ cultivars decreased most significantly, reaching 30.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced IRAT109 yield by 13.0%.

Material
IRAT109e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
13.0%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the yields of IRAT109 and HY73 cultivars decreased by 13.0% and 18.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced HY73 yield by 18.2%.

Material
HY73e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
18.2%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the yields of IRAT109 and HY73 cultivars decreased by 13.0% and 18.2%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1367 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per panicle, seed setting and grain weight were key factors in yield formation.

Organ / stage
grains per paniclee0
Outcome
yield formatione0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the number of grains per panicle, seed-setting rate, and 1000-grain weight were the key factors affecting yield formation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1536 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield correlated positively with photosynthetic and related measures.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positive correlatione0

Not reportedTaxonOrgan / stage

Verbatim

e0

“significant positive correlation between yield and net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, chla/chlb ratio, Rubisco activity, and Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1727 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield correlated negatively with MDA and NPQ.

Compound
MDAe0
Outcome
negative correlatione0
Direction
negative correlatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“negative correlation with MDA and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1745–1812 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

96 papers: 18 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.