Paper · 2024 · The Plant Cell

Arabidopsis WALL-ASSOCIATED KINASES are not required for oligogalacturonide-induced signaling and immunity

Laura Herold; Jana Ordon; Chenlei Hua; et al.

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
40
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Carbohydrate-based cell wall signaling impacts plant growth, development, and stress responses; however, how cell wall signals are perceived and transduced remains poorly understood. Several cell wall breakdown products have been described as typical damage-associated molecular patterns that activate plant immunity, including pectin-derived oligogalacturonides (OGs). Receptor kinases of the WALL-ASSOCIATED KINASE (WAK) family bind pectin and OGs and were previously proposed as OG receptors. However, unambiguous genetic evidence for the role of WAKs in OG responses is lacking. Here, we investigated the role of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) WAKs in OG perception using a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats mutant in which all 5 WAK genes were deleted. Using a combination of immune assays for early and late pattern-triggered immunity, we show that WAKs are dispensable for OG-induced signaling and immunity, indicating that they are not bona fide OG receptors.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WAK deletion did not prevent OG-induced signaling in Arabidopsis.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae0
Treatment
all 5 WAK genes were deletede1
Gene
WAK genese1
Outcome
OG-induced signalinge2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) WAKs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“using a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats mutant in which all 5 WAK genes were deleted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–784 · show in text ↑
e2

“WAKs are dispensable for OG-induced signaling and immunity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WAK deletion did not prevent OG-induced immunity in Arabidopsis.

Taxon
Arabidopsis thalianaArabidopsis thalianae0
Treatment
all 5 WAK genes were deletede1
Gene
WAK genese1
Outcome
OG-induced signaling and immunitye2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis thaliana
Arabidopsis thaliana · TaxonOriginal uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) WAKs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–656 · show in text ↑
e1

“using a clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats mutant in which all 5 WAK genes were deleted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–784 · show in text ↑
e2

“WAKs are dispensable for OG-induced signaling and immunity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–941 · show in text ↑

loss of function · disease · Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 31 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.