Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Foliar Application of PDKV Grade II Micronutrients on Growth and Yield of Watermelon

Nikita S. Sharnagat; A. M. Sonkamble; A. P. Wagh; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This experiment evaluated the impact of foliar application of PDKV grade II micronutrients on growth and yield of watermelon. The experiment was conducted in Factorial Randomized Block Design (FRBD) with three time of foliar applications(30, 40, and 50 DAT) and four levels of micronutrients (control, 2.5 ml/L, 5.0 ml/L and 10.0 ml/L) having twelve treatment combinations replicated thrice. Results found that the growth parameters viz., maximum length of vine (236.47 cm), number of leaves per vine (238.33) and chlorophyll index (62.14), lowest node at which first male (2.53) and female (7.47) flower appeared, minimum days to first male (26.47 days) and female (36.13 days) flower appearance and narrow male to female flower ratio (9.11) were recorded significantly in foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2) and yield parameters viz., maximum number of fruits per vine (2.90), average fruit weight (3.39 kg), fruit yield per vine (9.84 kg) and yield per hectare (492.07 q/ha)whereas minimum days required for edible maturity (71.91 days) were recorded in treatment combination of foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2). The lowest values for growth and yield parameters were recorded in control (D1M0).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT produced maximum length of vine.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
length of vinee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
236.47 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of vine (236.47 cm), number of leaves per vine (238.33) and chlorophyll index (62.14), lowest node at which first male (2.53) and female (7.47) flower appeared, minimum days to first male (26.47 days) and female (36.13 days) flower appearance and narrow male to female flower ratio (9.11) were recorded significantly in foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT produced maximum number of leaves per vine.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
number of leaves per vinee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
238.33e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of vine (236.47 cm), number of leaves per vine (238.33) and chlorophyll index (62.14), lowest node at which first male (2.53) and female (7.47) flower appeared, minimum days to first male (26.47 days) and female (36.13 days) flower appearance and narrow male to female flower ratio (9.11) were recorded significantly in foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT produced maximum chlorophyll index.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
62.14e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of vine (236.47 cm), number of leaves per vine (238.33) and chlorophyll index (62.14), lowest node at which first male (2.53) and female (7.47) flower appeared, minimum days to first male (26.47 days) and female (36.13 days) flower appearance and narrow male to female flower ratio (9.11) were recorded significantly in foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT produced lowest node at which first male.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
node at which first malee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.53e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of vine (236.47 cm), number of leaves per vine (238.33) and chlorophyll index (62.14), lowest node at which first male (2.53) and female (7.47) flower appeared, minimum days to first male (26.47 days) and female (36.13 days) flower appearance and narrow male to female flower ratio (9.11) were recorded significantly in foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT produced lowest female (7.47) flower appeared.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
female (7.47) flower appearede0
Direction
loweste0
Value
7.47e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of vine (236.47 cm), number of leaves per vine (238.33) and chlorophyll index (62.14), lowest node at which first male (2.53) and female (7.47) flower appeared, minimum days to first male (26.47 days) and female (36.13 days) flower appearance and narrow male to female flower ratio (9.11) were recorded significantly in foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT produced minimum days to first male.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
days to first malee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
26.47 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of vine (236.47 cm), number of leaves per vine (238.33) and chlorophyll index (62.14), lowest node at which first male (2.53) and female (7.47) flower appeared, minimum days to first male (26.47 days) and female (36.13 days) flower appearance and narrow male to female flower ratio (9.11) were recorded significantly in foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT produced minimum female (36.13 days) flower appearance.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
female (36.13 days) flower appearancee0
Direction
minimume0
Value
36.13 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of vine (236.47 cm), number of leaves per vine (238.33) and chlorophyll index (62.14), lowest node at which first male (2.53) and female (7.47) flower appeared, minimum days to first male (26.47 days) and female (36.13 days) flower appearance and narrow male to female flower ratio (9.11) were recorded significantly in foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT produced narrow male to female flower ratio.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
male to female flower ratioe0
Direction
narrowe0
Value
9.11e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum length of vine (236.47 cm), number of leaves per vine (238.33) and chlorophyll index (62.14), lowest node at which first male (2.53) and female (7.47) flower appeared, minimum days to first male (26.47 days) and female (36.13 days) flower appearance and narrow male to female flower ratio (9.11) were recorded significantly in foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 ml/L micronutrient application at 30 DAT produced maximum number of fruits per vine.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
number of fruits per vinee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2.90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of fruits per vine (2.90), average fruit weight (3.39 kg), fruit yield per vine (9.84 kg) and yield per hectare (492.07 q/ha)whereas minimum days required for edible maturity (71.91 days) were recorded in treatment combination of foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 ml/L micronutrient application at 30 DAT produced maximum average fruit weight.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3.39 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of fruits per vine (2.90), average fruit weight (3.39 kg), fruit yield per vine (9.84 kg) and yield per hectare (492.07 q/ha)whereas minimum days required for edible maturity (71.91 days) were recorded in treatment combination of foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 ml/L micronutrient application at 30 DAT produced maximum fruit yield per vine.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
fruit yield per vinee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.84 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of fruits per vine (2.90), average fruit weight (3.39 kg), fruit yield per vine (9.84 kg) and yield per hectare (492.07 q/ha)whereas minimum days required for edible maturity (71.91 days) were recorded in treatment combination of foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 ml/L micronutrient application at 30 DAT produced maximum yield per hectare.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
yield per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0
Value
492.07 q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of fruits per vine (2.90), average fruit weight (3.39 kg), fruit yield per vine (9.84 kg) and yield per hectare (492.07 q/ha)whereas minimum days required for edible maturity (71.91 days) were recorded in treatment combination of foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 ml/L micronutrient application at 30 DAT produced minimum days required for edible maturity.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DATe0
Outcome
days required for edible maturitye0
Direction
minimume0
Value
71.91 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum number of fruits per vine (2.90), average fruit weight (3.39 kg), fruit yield per vine (9.84 kg) and yield per hectare (492.07 q/ha)whereas minimum days required for edible maturity (71.91 days) were recorded in treatment combination of foliar application of 5 ml/L micronutrients at 30 DAT (D1M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the lowest growth and yield parameters.

Taxon
WatermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Treatment
control (D1M0)e0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest values for growth and yield parameters were recorded in control (D1M0).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑

application · phenology · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.