Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Demonstrating Agroecological Practices in Potato Production with Conservation Tillage and Pseudomonas spp., Azotobacter spp., Bacillus spp. Bacterial Inoculants—Evidence from Hungary

Jana Marjanović; Abdulrahman Maina Zubairu; Sandor Varga; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study explores agroecological practices designed to improve soil quality and crop yield in small-scale agriculture, focusing on soil inoculation with beneficial bacteria over conventional fertilizers. Conducted at the SZIA Agroecological Garden MATE in Gödöllő, Hungary, the research utilizes 12 plots to evaluate different conservation tillage methods, including minimum and no-tillage, with and without microbial inoculation. Commenced in 2022, this study centers on potato cultivation (Solanum tuberosum L.) and includes comprehensive chemical and physical analyses of soil and harvested potatoes, alongside continuous monitoring of growth. Statistical analysis using One-way Anova in R revealed p-values predominantly above 0.05, indicating no significant differences across most parameters, though variations in soil plasticity and pH (KCl) were noted. Results suggest that substantial treatmeent differences may require a longer observation period. Notably, plots with microbial inoculation exhibited higher harvest weights and tuber sizes compared to control plots. Additionally, trends and interactions were found between weed abundance, total harvest, and plant height. The findings indicate that the benefits of integrated agroecological practices, including conservation tillage, may take time to materialize, emphasizing the necessity for extended observation. This research lays the groundwork for future studies, underscoring the importance of patience in achieving improvements in soil health and crop quality through sustainable agricultural methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most measured parameters did not differ significantly among treatments.

Outcome
most parameterse0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Value
0.05e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“p-values predominantly above 0.05, indicating no significant differences across most parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plasticity and pH varied across treatments.

Outcome
soil plasticity and pH (KCl)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variations in soil plasticity and pH (KCl) were noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation plots had higher potato harvest weights than controls.

Treatment
microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
harvest weightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plots with microbial inoculation exhibited higher harvest weights and tuber sizes compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation plots had larger potato tubers than controls.

Treatment
microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
tuber sizese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plots with microbial inoculation exhibited higher harvest weights and tuber sizes compared to control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed abundance, potato harvest and plant height showed trends and interactions.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total harvest, and plant heighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trends and interactions were found between weed abundance, total harvest, and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend extended observation to assess conservation tillage benefits.

Outcome
extended observatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“benefits of integrated agroecological practices, including conservation tillage, may take time to materialize, emphasizing the necessity for extended observation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1376 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 80 positive, 13 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.