Paper · 2015 · Plant Pathology

Root infection of potato by Spongospora subterranea : knowledge review and evidence for decreased plant productivity

R. E. Falloon; U. Merz; R. C. Butler; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
71
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Information is reviewed on root infection of potato by the plasmodiophorid Spongospora subterranea f. sp. subterranea . This pathogen has long been recognized as the cause of root galls (hyperplasia) and the economically important disease powdery scab on tubers (modified stolons). The significance for plant productivity of the zoosporangium stages of the pathogen in potato roots has only recently begun to be documented. Two experiments are described that assessed effects of S. subterranea root infection on potato plant root function and productivity. A greenhouse experiment measured root function and plant parameters for eight potato cultivars with markedly different susceptibilities to tuber powdery scab. Water uptake and plant growth were reduced by S. subterranea inoculation in all eight cultivars. The magnitudes of these negative effects, and intensities of root hyperplasia, differed among the cultivars, but were not related to respective susceptibilities to tuber powdery scab. A field trial assessed root function and plant productivity for a cultivar (Iwa) that is very susceptible to Spongospora tuber and root diseases. Soil water content beneath uninoculated plants was consistently less than for inoculated plants, indicating that inoculation reduced water uptake (root function). Inoculation reduced shoot and root dry weights, and reduced weight of tubers per plant by 42%. Spongospora subterranea causes three diseases of potato: root membrane dysfunction, root hyperplasia and tuber powdery scab. The root diseases caused by the pathogen are likely to be important both for powdery scab management and for deleterious effects on potato crop yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. subterranea inoculation reduced potato water uptake in all eight cultivars.

Treatment
S. subterranea inoculatione0
Interactor
S. subterraneaSpongospora subterraneae0pathogen
Outcome
Water uptakee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spongospora subterranea
Spongospora subterranea · InteractorA.J.Gevens · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water uptake and plant growth were reduced by S. subterranea inoculation in all eight cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. subterranea inoculation reduced potato plant growth in all eight cultivars.

Treatment
S. subterranea inoculatione0
Interactor
S. subterraneaSpongospora subterraneae0pathogen
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spongospora subterranea
Spongospora subterranea · InteractorA.J.Gevens · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water uptake and plant growth were reduced by S. subterranea inoculation in all eight cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–811 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The negative effects and root hyperplasia intensity differed among potato cultivars.

Material
cultivarse0
Outcome
intensities of root hyperplasiae0
Direction
differede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitudes of these negative effects, and intensities of root hyperplasia, differed among the cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–920 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato root responses were not related to cultivar susceptibility to tuber powdery scab.

Outcome
susceptibilities to tuber powdery scabe0
Qualifier
were not relatede0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialDirection

Verbatim

e0

“were not related to respective susceptibilities to tuber powdery scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil beneath uninoculated potato plants held less water than beneath inoculated plants.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
Soil water contente0
Direction
less thane0
Comparator
uninoculated plantse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil water content beneath uninoculated plants was consistently less than for inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced potato shoot dry weight.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation reduced shoot and root dry weights, and reduced weight of tubers per plant by 42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced potato root dry weight.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
root dry weightse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation reduced shoot and root dry weights, and reduced weight of tubers per plant by 42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced potato tuber weight per plant by 42%.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Outcome
weight of tubers per plante0
Direction
reducede0
Value
42%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation reduced shoot and root dry weights, and reduced weight of tubers per plant by 42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1399 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spongospora subterranea causes potato root membrane dysfunction.

Interactor
Spongospora subterraneaSpongospora subterraneae0pathogen
Outcome
root membrane dysfunctione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spongospora subterranea
Spongospora subterranea · InteractorA.J.Gevens · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spongospora subterranea causes three diseases of potato: root membrane dysfunction, root hyperplasia and tuber powdery scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1524 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spongospora subterranea causes potato root hyperplasia.

Interactor
Spongospora subterraneaSpongospora subterraneae0pathogen
Outcome
root hyperplasiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spongospora subterranea
Spongospora subterranea · InteractorA.J.Gevens · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spongospora subterranea causes three diseases of potato: root membrane dysfunction, root hyperplasia and tuber powdery scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1524 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spongospora subterranea causes potato tuber powdery scab.

Interactor
Spongospora subterraneaSpongospora subterraneae0pathogen
Outcome
tuber powdery scabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spongospora subterranea
Spongospora subterranea · InteractorA.J.Gevens · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spongospora subterranea causes three diseases of potato: root membrane dysfunction, root hyperplasia and tuber powdery scab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1524 · show in text ↑

Spongospora subterranea · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Spongospora subterranea · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · soil: physics · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 80 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

inoculation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 82 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 82 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.