Paper · 2026 · International Journal of Agronomy

Evaluating Fertilization Strategies in Potato Crop for Improved Productivity Under Agro‐Ecological Conditions of Pakistan

Muhammad Wasim Haider; Khurram Ziaf; Aman Ullah Malik; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Potato is the main source of income for the growers of middle Punjab, Pakistan. Despite being a key cash crop, potato yields remain below potential, mainly due to inefficient fertilizer management in alkaline sandy loam soils, necessitating strategies that can enhance tuber yields. This 2‐year study aimed to enhance potato yield by optimizing fertilizer application strategies, comparing conventional synthetic phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) applications with plant growth–promoting bacteria (PGPB)–coated biofertilizers. Potato cv. Sante was evaluated under three treatments: four split applications of synthetic P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 , control) fertilizer, six split applications of synthetic P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 ) fertilizer, and six split applications of PGPB‐coated P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 ) biofertilizer. Results showed that increasing the number of split applications improved all growth attributes. The highest performance was recorded with PGPB‐coated biofertilizers, which enhanced intercellular CO 2 concentration by 91.6%, photosynthetic rate by 8.9%, and water use efficiency by 37.4% to the control, while reducing stomatal conductance and transpiration rate by 15.5% and 20.6%, respectively. Although photosynthetic rate correlated weakly with total yield, it showed a moderate relationship with rashan‐grade yield. Overall, PGPB‐coated P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 ) biofertilizers applied in six splits significantly improved total and rashan‐grade yields while minimizing downgrade yield. These findings support the use of PGPB‐coated biofertilizers as an eco‐friendly and efficient strategy for boosting potato productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More split applications improved growth attributes.

Treatment
increasing the number of split applicationse0
Outcome
all growth attributese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing the number of split applications improved all growth attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB-coated fertilizer increased intercellular CO2 concentration by 91.6% relative to control.

Treatment
PGPB‐coated biofertilizerse0
Outcome
intercellular CO 2 concentratione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
91.6%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB‐coated biofertilizers, which enhanced intercellular CO 2 concentration by 91.6%, photosynthetic rate by 8.9%, and water use efficiency by 37.4% to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB-coated fertilizer increased photosynthetic rate by 8.9% relative to control.

Treatment
PGPB‐coated biofertilizerse0
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
8.9%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB‐coated biofertilizers, which enhanced intercellular CO 2 concentration by 91.6%, photosynthetic rate by 8.9%, and water use efficiency by 37.4% to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB-coated fertilizer increased water use efficiency by 37.4% relative to control.

Treatment
PGPB‐coated biofertilizerse0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
37.4%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedInteractor

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB‐coated biofertilizers, which enhanced intercellular CO 2 concentration by 91.6%, photosynthetic rate by 8.9%, and water use efficiency by 37.4% to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB-coated fertilizer reduced stomatal conductance by 15.5%.

Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
15.5%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing stomatal conductance and transpiration rate by 15.5% and 20.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPB-coated fertilizer reduced transpiration rate by 20.6%.

Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
20.6%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing stomatal conductance and transpiration rate by 15.5% and 20.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate correlated weakly with total yield.

Outcome
total yielde0
Qualifier
weaklye0

Not reportedOrgan / stageTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“photosynthetic rate correlated weakly with total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate showed a moderate relationship with rashan-grade yield.

Outcome
rashan‐grade yielde0
Qualifier
moderatee0

Not reportedOrgan / stageTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it showed a moderate relationship with rashan‐grade yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six splits of PGPB-coated P:N biofertilizer significantly improved total yield.

Treatment
PGPB‐coated P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 ) biofertilizers applied in six splitse0
Outcome
totale0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB‐coated P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 ) biofertilizers applied in six splits significantly improved total and rashan‐grade yields while minimizing downgrade yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six splits of PGPB-coated P:N biofertilizer significantly improved rashan-grade yield.

Treatment
PGPB‐coated P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 ) biofertilizers applied in six splitse0
Outcome
rashan‐grade yieldse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB‐coated P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 ) biofertilizers applied in six splits significantly improved total and rashan‐grade yields while minimizing downgrade yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Six splits of PGPB-coated P:N biofertilizer minimized downgrade yield.

Treatment
PGPB‐coated P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 ) biofertilizers applied in six splitse0
Outcome
downgrade yielde0
Direction
minimizinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPB‐coated P:N (185:250 kg ha −1 ) biofertilizers applied in six splits significantly improved total and rashan‐grade yields while minimizing downgrade yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · physiology: water · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

93 papers: 80 positive, 13 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.