Abstract
In world agriculture, the Russian Federation occupies one of the leading places among oat growing countries and it is one of the five main suppliers of oat grain to the world agricultural markets. In the Siberian region, oat is considered one of the main and important fodder-grain crops. One of the most effective and cost-effective elements of crop production is the variety. A variety that is correctly selected for agricultural technology and crop production conditions, adapted to production conditions and maximally capable of achieving its biological potential under given conditions is one of the main criteria for the success of a crop grower. The research goal is to evaluate the elements of agricultural technology and identify the most effective ones that influence on the formation of the yielding capacity of the oat variety Korifey. The field experimental research was carried out on the experimental field of the Federal Altai Scientific Center of Agro-Biotechnologies from 2020 through 2022. Related studies and processing of research findings were carried out at the Altai State Agricultural University. Field trial establishment, observations, and statistical processing of the research findings obtained were carried out in accordance with methodological guidelines. There were 12 variants altogether. Spring wheat was a preceding crop. Three-year average yield in the trial made 2.83 t ha. In the variant without any tillage, the yield made 2.5 t ha; yield gain of 0.4 t ha to 2.9 t ha was obtained in the variants with minimal tillage. The highest yields compared to the variants with minimal tillage and without tillage were obtained in the variants with deep tillage - 3.1 t ha; the advantage was 16.0% and 24%, respectively. Depending on additional elements of agricultural technology, the yields in the variants were different. The maximum yields in groups with different tillage were obtained in the variants with the application of fertilizers and plant protection products – 4; 8; 12-2.8; 2.9; and 3.4 t ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
The three-year average trial yield was 2.83 t ha.
- Taxon
- OAT
Avena sativat0 - Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 2.83 t hae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three-year average yield in the trial made 2.83 t ha.”
t0“OAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Without tillage, oat yield was 2.5 t ha.
- Taxon
- OATAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- without any tillagee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Value
- 2.5 t hae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the variant without any tillage, the yield made 2.5 t ha”
t0“OAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimal tillage produced a 0.4 t ha yield gain to 2.9 t ha.
- Taxon
- OATAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- minimal tillagee0
- Outcome
- yield gaine0
- Direction
- gaine0
- Value
- 0.4 t hae0
- Qualifier
- 2.9 t hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield gain of 0.4 t ha to 2.9 t ha was obtained in the variants with minimal tillage.”
t0“OAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage produced 3.1 t ha and exceeded minimal tillage by 16.0%.
- Taxon
- OATAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- deep tillagee0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 16.0%e0
- Qualifier
- 3.1 t hae0
- Comparator
- minimal tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yields compared to the variants with minimal tillage and without tillage were obtained in the variants with deep tillage - 3.1 t ha; the advantage was 16.0% and 24%, respectively.”
t0“OAT”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage produced 3.1 t ha and exceeded no tillage by 24%.
- Taxon
- OATAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- deep tillagee0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 24%e0
- Qualifier
- 3.1 t hae0
- Comparator
- without tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yields compared to the variants with minimal tillage and without tillage were obtained in the variants with deep tillage - 3.1 t ha; the advantage was 16.0% and 24%, respectively.”
t0“OAT”
Claim · model-written summary
With fertilizers and plant protection products, the maximum yield in one tillage group was 2.8 t ha.
- Taxon
- OATAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- application of fertilizers and plant protection productse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.8e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yields in groups with different tillage were obtained in the variants with the application of fertilizers and plant protection products – 4; 8; 12-2.8; 2.9; and 3.4 t ha.”
t0“OAT”
Claim · model-written summary
With fertilizers and plant protection products, the maximum yield in another tillage group was 2.9 t ha.
- Taxon
- OATAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- application of fertilizers and plant protection productse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 2.9e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yields in groups with different tillage were obtained in the variants with the application of fertilizers and plant protection products – 4; 8; 12-2.8; 2.9; and 3.4 t ha.”
t0“OAT”
Claim · model-written summary
With fertilizers and plant protection products, the maximum yield in the third tillage group was 3.4 t ha.
- Taxon
- OATAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- application of fertilizers and plant protection productse0
- Outcome
- yieldse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 3.4 t hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum yields in groups with different tillage were obtained in the variants with the application of fertilizers and plant protection products – 4; 8; 12-2.8; 2.9; and 3.4 t ha.”
t0“OAT”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.