Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Integrated application of bio-slurry and chemical fertilizer for optimizing growth and yield of tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum mill.)

Getachew Sime; Tseganesh Lolamo; Yadessa Gonfa Keneni; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The integrated application of organic and chemical fertilizers is more effective in sustainable agriculture than the sole application of organic or chemical fertilizers. This study assessed the effect of sole and blended application of bio-slurry and chemical fertilizer on the vegetative growth and yield of tomatoes. A randomized complete block design comprising six treatments was conducted: 75% bioslurry +25% chemical fertilizer, 50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizer, 25% bioslurry +75% chemical fertilizer, 100% bioslurry, 100% chemical fertilizer, and control. The blending application of chemical fertilizer and bioslurry generally increased the vegetative growth and yield of tomato compared to the sole bioslurry and chemical fertilizer application, and the control. For instance, compared to the control, the application of 50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizers increased the number of secondary branches by 73%, the number of fruits per cluster by 50%, marketable yield by 17.45 tonha−1 and total yield by 9.9 tonha−1. Blending bioslurry and chemical fertilizer promoted vegetative growth and yield, and amended flowering, fruiting, and maturity. The blending application of 1bioslurry: 1chemical fertilizer became an optimum rate for increasing tomato production in the study area. Overall, the blending application of organic and chemical fertilizers could help in developing sustainable agricultural practices through providing balanced and sufficient nutrient availability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blending chemical fertilizer and bioslurry increases vegetative growth and yield of tomato compared with sole applications and control.

Treatment
blending application of chemical fertilizer and bioslurrye0
Outcome
vegetative growth and yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole bioslurry and chemical fertilizer application, and the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–132 · show in text ↑
e0

“The blending application of chemical fertilizer and bioslurry generally increased the vegetative growth and yield of tomato compared to the sole bioslurry and chemical fertilizer application, and the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizers increases the number of secondary branches by 73% compared with control.

Treatment
50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizerse1
Outcome
number of secondary branchese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
73%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the control, the application of 50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizers increased the number of secondary branches by 73%, the number of fruits per cluster by 50%, marketable yield by 17.45 tonha−1 and total yield by 9.9 tonha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizers increases the number of fruits per cluster by 50% compared with control.

Treatment
50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizerse1
Outcome
number of fruits per clustere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
50%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the control, the application of 50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizers increased the number of secondary branches by 73%, the number of fruits per cluster by 50%, marketable yield by 17.45 tonha−1 and total yield by 9.9 tonha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizers increases marketable yield by 17.45 tonha−1 compared with control.

Treatment
50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizerse1
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
17.45 tonha−1e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the control, the application of 50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizers increased the number of secondary branches by 73%, the number of fruits per cluster by 50%, marketable yield by 17.45 tonha−1 and total yield by 9.9 tonha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizers increases total yield by 9.9 tonha−1 compared with control.

Treatment
50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizerse1
Outcome
total yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
9.9 tonha−1e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to the control, the application of 50% bioslurry +50% chemical fertilizers increased the number of secondary branches by 73%, the number of fruits per cluster by 50%, marketable yield by 17.45 tonha−1 and total yield by 9.9 tonha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blending bioslurry and chemical fertilizer amends flowering, fruiting and maturity of tomato.

Treatment
Blending bioslurry and chemical fertilizere2
Outcome
flowering, fruiting, and maturitye2
Direction
amendede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–132 · show in text ↑
e2

“Blending bioslurry and chemical fertilizer promoted vegetative growth and yield, and amended flowering, fruiting, and maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1161 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A 1:1 blend of bioslurry and chemical fertilizer is an optimum rate for increasing tomato production in the study area.

Treatment
1bioslurry: 1chemical fertilizere3
Outcome
optimum rate for increasing tomato productione3
Setting
the study areae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–132 · show in text ↑
e3

“The blending application of 1bioslurry: 1chemical fertilizer became an optimum rate for increasing tomato production in the study area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1297 · show in text ↑

fertilization · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 41 positive, 7 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

664 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.