Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Vegetable Science

Yield and Profitability of Tomato as Influenced by Integrated Application of Synthetic Fertilizer and Biogas Slurry

Zannatul Ferdous; Hayat Ullah; Avishek Datta; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
33
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Biogas slurry, a by-product of biogas production generated from anaerobic digestion of animal waste and crop residues, is often considered a waste product. Being a cheap source of organic matter and plant nutrients, its application may improve soil fertility, and yield quality and quantity. Field experiments were conducted at Lahirirhat Farming System Research and Development site, Rangpur, Bangladesh, to assess effects of biogas slurry in combination with synthetic fertilizer on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) yield and profitability. Treatments included: soil test-based fertilizer, synthetic fertilizer+cow dung manure @ 5 t∙ha−1, synthetic fertilizer+cow dung bioslurry @ 5 t∙ha−1, synthetic fertilizer+poultry manure @ 3 t∙ha−1, synthetic fertilizer+poultry bioslurry @ 3 t∙ha−1, and farmer practice. Fruit yield was higher for plants grown with synthetic fertilizer+cow dung bioslurry compared with other fertilizer treatments and the farmer practice. Application of synthetic fertilizer+poultry bioslurry resulted in the highest fruit yield; plants maintained with the farmer practice yielded the least. The highest gross return and gross margin were obtained from plants treated with synthetic fertilizer+cow dung bioslurry. Synthetic fertilizer+poultry bioslurry-treated plants returned the highest gross return and gross margin. Application of synthetic fertilizer in combination with bioslurry has potential in increasing tomato yield and economic return of farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic fertilizer with cow dung bioslurry produced higher tomato fruit yield than other fertilizers and farmer practice.

Treatment
synthetic fertilizer+cow dung bioslurrye0
Outcome
Fruit yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other fertilizer treatments and the farmer practicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit yield was higher for plants grown with synthetic fertilizer+cow dung bioslurry compared with other fertilizer treatments and the farmer practice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–964 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic fertilizer with poultry bioslurry gave the highest tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
synthetic fertilizer+poultry bioslurrye0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of synthetic fertilizer+poultry bioslurry resulted in the highest fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1054 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmer practice gave the lowest tomato fruit yield.

Treatment
farmer practicee0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
the leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants maintained with the farmer practice yielded the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1116 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic fertilizer with cow dung bioslurry gave the highest gross return and margin.

Treatment
synthetic fertilizer+cow dung bioslurrye0
Outcome
gross return and gross margine0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross return and gross margin were obtained from plants treated with synthetic fertilizer+cow dung bioslurry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1239 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Synthetic fertilizer with poultry bioslurry gave the highest gross return and margin.

Treatment
Synthetic fertilizer+poultry bioslurrye0
Outcome
gross return and gross margine0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Synthetic fertilizer+poultry bioslurry-treated plants returned the highest gross return and gross margin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1345 · show in text ↑
t1

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–33 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

978 papers: 850 positive, 128 negative or no effect

849 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

974 papers more in this group

See all 978 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.