Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Integrated Management of Stem Rot of Groundnut Caused by Sclerotium rolfsii under in vitro Conditions

J. Vamshi; G. Uma Devi; Hari Kishan Sudini; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: Groundnut stem rot, caused by Sclerotium rolfsii, is notorious for causing significant economic losses in groundnut production worldwide. Methods: A field trial on the integrated management of stem rot disease in groundnut was conducted at the International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics during the rabi seasons of 2021-22 and 2022-23. This involved the use of in vitro effective fungicides and biocontrol agents. The experiment was organized in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) featuring ten treatment combinations, including an untreated control, with three replications and a spacing of 30 x 10 cm. Result: During the field evaluation in the rabi seasons of 2021-22 and 2022-23, the bioagents Trichoderma viride, Bacillus cereus and the fungicide azoxystrobin showed remarkable performance. Among the various treatments, T10, which included Trichoderma viride and Bacillus cereus as seed treatment (ST) and soil application (SA) along with a reduced rate of azoxystrobin, proved to be the most effective in managing stem rot in groundnut. Treatment T8, consisting of Trichoderma viride as ST+SA and a reduced rate of azoxystrobin and treatment T9, featuring Bacillus cereus as ST+SA with a reduced rate of azoxystrobin, also demonstrated good disease control under both glasshouse and field conditions. Moreover, these treatments led to significant improvements in growth and yield parameters, with the highest pod yield and benefit-cost ratio recorded. In summary, the bioagents Trichoderma viride, Bacillus cereus and the fungicide azoxystrobin have shown considerable promise for the effective management of stem rot in groundnut and can be applied in field settings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T10 was most effective in managing groundnut stem rot.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Trichoderma viride and Bacillus cereus as seed treatment (ST) and soil application (SA) along with a reduced rate of azoxystrobine0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
stem rote0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · Second interactorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T10, which included Trichoderma viride and Bacillus cereus as seed treatment (ST) and soil application (SA) along with a reduced rate of azoxystrobin, proved to be the most effective in managing stem rot in groundnut.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1079 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T8 controlled groundnut stem rot in glasshouse and field conditions.

Treatment
Trichoderma viride as ST+SA and a reduced rate of azoxystrobine0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
goode0
Setting
glasshouse and field conditionse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T8, consisting of Trichoderma viride as ST+SA and a reduced rate of azoxystrobin and treatment T9, featuring Bacillus cereus as ST+SA with a reduced rate of azoxystrobin, also demonstrated good disease control under both glasshouse and field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T9 controlled groundnut stem rot in glasshouse and field conditions.

Treatment
Bacillus cereus as ST+SA with a reduced rate of azoxystrobine0
Interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
goode0
Setting
glasshouse and field conditionse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T9, featuring Bacillus cereus as ST+SA with a reduced rate of azoxystrobin, also demonstrated good disease control under both glasshouse and field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The effective treatments significantly improved groundnut growth and yield parameters.

Treatment
these treatmentse0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
improvementse0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“these treatments led to significant improvements in growth and yield parameters, with the highest pod yield and benefit-cost ratio recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments recorded the highest pod yield.

Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“with the highest pod yield and benefit-cost ratio recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1494 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments recorded the highest benefit-cost ratio.

Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“with the highest pod yield and benefit-cost ratio recorded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1494 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the biological agents and azoxystrobin for field management of groundnut stem rot.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Trichoderma viride, Bacillus cereus and the fungicide azoxystrobine0
Outcome
management of stem rote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bioagents Trichoderma viride, Bacillus cereus and the fungicide azoxystrobin have shown considerable promise for the effective management of stem rot in groundnut and can be applied in field settings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1711 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

azoxystrobin · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Bacillus cereus · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Trichoderma viride · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

salicylic acid · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Trichoderma viride · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 41 positive, 3 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

application · disease · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 48 positive, 4 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.