Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Residual effect of integrated nutrient management and direct effect of fertility levels on growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram under Indian mustard - green gram cropping sequence

Patel PR; Kumawat PD; Chaudhary JH; et al.

13
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out under medium black calcareous soil during rabi and summer seasons of 2020- 21 and 2021-22 at the Pearl Millet Research Station, Junagadh Agricultural University, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India, to study the Residual effect of integrated nutrient management and direct effect of fertility levels on growth, yield, quality, nutrient content, uptake and monetary efficiency of green gram .The eight treatments consisted of integrated nutrient management to Indian mustard in rabi season as main plot treatments in RBD. During summer season each main plot treatments was splited into three sub plot treatments with three levels of recommended dose of fertilizers to green gram in split plot design. The residual effect of 50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 applied to preceding Indian mustard recorded significantly higher growth parameters of the succeeding summer green gram crop viz., plant height, number of branches/plant and dry matter accumulation at 45 DAS and at harvest, respectively, physiological parameters viz., CGR and NAR at different stages, yield attributes and yield viz., number of pods per plant, length of pod, number of seed per pod, seed, stover and biological yields, quality parameters viz., protein content and protein yield, nutrient content viz., N and P content in seed and stover, N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn and Mn uptake by seed and stover, total uptake by green gram and available N, P2O5 and organic carbon in soil after harvest of green gram. Whereas, direct application of fertility levels to green gram in summer season is concerned, the treatments having 100% RDF recorded significantly higher values of growth attributes, physiological parameters, yield attributes, seed and stover yields, protein content, protein yield, nutrient content (N and P), uptake of N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn and Mn by seed and stover and available nitrogen and phosphorus after harvest of green gram crop. The highest gross return (₹106443ha-1), net return (₹73583 ha-1) and B: C ratios (2.24) were obtained under residual effect of treatment 50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 to Indian mustard crop. Among the fertility levels applied to green gram higher gross return (₹98808 ha-1), net returns (₹64773 ha-1) and B: C ratios (1.90) were obtained with application of 100% RDF in green gram.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 50% RDF plus FYM increased green gram growth parameters.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
plant height, number of branches/plant and dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 applied to preceding Indian mustard recorded significantly higher growth parameters of the succeeding summer green gram crop viz., plant height, number of branches/plant and dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 50% RDF plus FYM increased growth rates and yield components.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
CGR and NARe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 applied to preceding Indian mustard recorded significantly higher growth parameters of the succeeding summer green gram crop viz., plant height, number of branches/plant and dry matter accumulation at 45 DAS and at harvest, respectively, physiological parameters viz., CGR and NAR at different stages, yield attributes and yield viz., number of pods per plant, length of pod, number of seed per pod, seed, stover and biological yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual 50% RDF plus FYM increased seed, stover and biological yields.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
seed, stover and biological yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 applied to preceding Indian mustard recorded significantly higher growth parameters of the succeeding summer green gram crop viz., plant height, number of branches/plant and dry matter accumulation at 45 DAS and at harvest, respectively, physiological parameters viz., CGR and NAR at different stages, yield attributes and yield viz., number of pods per plant, length of pod, number of seed per pod, seed, stover and biological yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual treatment increased protein content and protein yield.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
protein content and protein yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 applied to preceding Indian mustard recorded significantly higher growth parameters of the succeeding summer green gram crop viz., plant height, number of branches/plant and dry matter accumulation at 45 DAS and at harvest, respectively, physiological parameters viz., CGR and NAR at different stages, yield attributes and yield viz., number of pods per plant, length of pod, number of seed per pod, seed, stover and biological yields, quality parameters viz., protein content and protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual treatment increased nutrient content and uptake.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
N and P content in seed and stover, N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn and Mn uptake by seed and stovere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 applied to preceding Indian mustard recorded significantly higher growth parameters of the succeeding summer green gram crop viz., plant height, number of branches/plant and dry matter accumulation at 45 DAS and at harvest, respectively, physiological parameters viz., CGR and NAR at different stages, yield attributes and yield viz., number of pods per plant, length of pod, number of seed per pod, seed, stover and biological yields, quality parameters viz., protein content and protein yield, nutrient content viz., N and P content in seed and stover, N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn and Mn uptake by seed and stover, total uptake by green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual treatment increased available soil nutrients and organic carbon.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
available N, P2O5 and organic carbon in soile0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 applied to preceding Indian mustard recorded significantly higher growth parameters of the succeeding summer green gram crop viz., plant height, number of branches/plant and dry matter accumulation at 45 DAS and at harvest, respectively, physiological parameters viz., CGR and NAR at different stages, yield attributes and yield viz., number of pods per plant, length of pod, number of seed per pod, seed, stover and biological yields, quality parameters viz., protein content and protein yield, nutrient content viz., N and P content in seed and stover, N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn and Mn uptake by seed and stover, total uptake by green gram and available N, P2O5 and organic carbon in soil after harvest of green gram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct 100% RDF increased growth, physiology, yield, protein and nutrient results.

Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
growth attributes, physiological parameters, yield attributese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDF recorded significantly higher values of growth attributes, physiological parameters, yield attributes, seed and stover yields, protein content, protein yield, nutrient content (N and P), uptake of N, P, K, S, Fe, Zn and Mn by seed and stover and available nitrogen and phosphorus after harvest of green gram crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual treatment yielded the highest gross return of ₹106443ha-1.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹106443ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross return (₹106443ha-1), net return (₹73583 ha-1) and B: C ratios (2.24) were obtained under residual effect of treatment 50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 to Indian mustard crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2114 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual treatment yielded the highest net return of ₹73583 ha-1.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
₹73583 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross return (₹106443ha-1), net return (₹73583 ha-1) and B: C ratios (2.24) were obtained under residual effect of treatment 50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 to Indian mustard crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2114 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual treatment yielded the highest benefit to cost ratio of 2.24.

Treatment
50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
B: C ratiose0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.24e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross return (₹106443ha-1), net return (₹73583 ha-1) and B: C ratios (2.24) were obtained under residual effect of treatment 50% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1 to Indian mustard crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2114 · show in text ↑
t0

“growth, yield, monetary efficiency and soil properties of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct 100% RDF yielded gross return of ₹98808 ha-1.

Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹98808 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher gross return (₹98808 ha-1), net returns (₹64773 ha-1) and B: C ratios (1.90) were obtained with application of 100% RDF in green gram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2164–2305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct 100% RDF yielded net returns of ₹64773 ha-1.

Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
₹64773 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher gross return (₹98808 ha-1), net returns (₹64773 ha-1) and B: C ratios (1.90) were obtained with application of 100% RDF in green gram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2164–2305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct 100% RDF yielded benefit to cost ratio of 1.90.

Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
B: C ratiose0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.90e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher gross return (₹98808 ha-1), net returns (₹64773 ha-1) and B: C ratios (1.90) were obtained with application of 100% RDF in green gram.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2164–2305 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.