Paper · 2025 · Agriculture

Adaptation Strategies for Hemp in Alkaline Salt Environments: Fertilizer Management for Nutrient Uptake and Optimizing Growth

Yunshu Ye; Haoyu Wang; Panpan Zhang; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Global soil salinization has become an increasingly severe challenge for agricultural production, particularly affecting the cultivation of economic crops in marginal lands. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.), despite its economic potential, exhibits a notable sensitivity to salt-alkaline stress, limiting its expansion in saline-alkali regions. This study investigated the regulatory effects of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilizers on hemp growth and nutrient homeostasis under alkaline salt stress. Using a “3414” orthogonal experimental design, we evaluated fourteen NPK combinations under 200 mM NaHCO3 stress, a concentration determined through preliminary experiments to simulate moderate alkaline stress. Plant growth parameters, biomass partitioning, and mineral nutrient profiles were analyzed after treatment with three biological replicates. The N1P2K2 treatment (N 120 mg·L−1, P 238 mg·L−1, K 348 mg·L−1) significantly enhanced plant performance, increasing shoot biomass by 45.3% and root biomass by 38.7% compared to the control. This optimal combination maintains the K+/Na+ ratio in leaves above 1.2 and regulated Ca2+/Mg2+ homeostasis, maintaining a ratio of 2.8–3.2, indicating improved salt tolerance. Notably, excessive fertilizer applications (>400 mg·L−1 total nutrients) exacerbated salt injury, reducing biomass accumulation by 25–30% and disrupting ion homeostasis. Our findings reveal the critical thresholds for NPK application in hemp under alkaline stress and provide practical fertilization strategies for sustainable hemp cultivation in saline-alkali regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N1P2K2 raised hemp shoot biomass by 45.3% over control.

Treatment
N1P2K2 treatment (N 120 mg·L−1, P 238 mg·L−1, K 348 mg·L−1)e0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
45.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N1P2K2 treatment (N 120 mg·L−1, P 238 mg·L−1, K 348 mg·L−1) significantly enhanced plant performance, increasing shoot biomass by 45.3% and root biomass by 38.7% compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N1P2K2 raised hemp root biomass by 38.7% over control.

Treatment
N1P2K2 treatment (N 120 mg·L−1, P 238 mg·L−1, K 348 mg·L−1)e0
Outcome
root biomasse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
38.7%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The N1P2K2 treatment (N 120 mg·L−1, P 238 mg·L−1, K 348 mg·L−1) significantly enhanced plant performance, increasing shoot biomass by 45.3% and root biomass by 38.7% compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal NPK combination maintained leaf K+/Na+ above 1.2.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
optimal combinatione0
Outcome
K+/Na+ ratio in leavese0
Direction
abovee0
Value
1.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This optimal combination maintains the K+/Na+ ratio in leaves above 1.2 and regulated Ca2+/Mg2+ homeostasis, maintaining a ratio of 2.8–3.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal NPK combination maintained Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio at 2.8–3.2.

Treatment
optimal combinatione0
Outcome
Ca2+/Mg2+ homeostasise0
Direction
maintaininge0
Value
2.8–3.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This optimal combination maintains the K+/Na+ ratio in leaves above 1.2 and regulated Ca2+/Mg2+ homeostasis, maintaining a ratio of 2.8–3.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1209 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess fertilizer reduced biomass accumulation by 25–30%.

Treatment
excessive fertilizer applications (>400 mg·L−1 total nutrients)e0
Outcome
biomass accumulatione0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
25–30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excessive fertilizer applications (>400 mg·L−1 total nutrients) exacerbated salt injury, reducing biomass accumulation by 25–30% and disrupting ion homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excess fertilizer worsened salt injury and disrupted ion homeostasis.

Treatment
excessive fertilizer applications (>400 mg·L−1 total nutrients)e0
Outcome
salt injurye0
Direction
exacerbatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa
Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Bastique assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“excessive fertilizer applications (>400 mg·L−1 total nutrients) exacerbated salt injury, reducing biomass accumulation by 25–30% and disrupting ion homeostasis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1415 · show in text ↑
t0

“Hemp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Cannabis sativaResults differ

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.