Paper · 2024 · Phytopathologia Mediterranea

Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt

Bandar ALMIMAN; Ahmed H. ZIAN; Salama A.S. EL-BLASY; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Antifungal properties of nanoparticles (NPs) of copper oxide (CuO), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and silica dioxide (SiO₂) were compared to the fungicide thiophanate-methyl for controlling root rot and wilt of chickpea, caused by, respectively, Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris. Different concentrations (10, 20, or 40 ppm) of the NPs were assessed for their ability to inhibit fungal growth in vitro. All the nanoparticles had antifungal activity, with greatest effects at 40 ppm. CuO NPs at 40 ppm gave 61% reduction for Rhizoctonia rot and 65% reduction for Fusarium wilt. Alterations in the ultrastructure of the fungal mycelia were observed in response to treating with CuO NPs. No differences in in vivo tests were observed between CuO NPs and thiophanate-methyl for reducing root rot or wilt. Applications of CuO NPs also enhanced growth and yield of chickpea plants. CuO NPs had antifungal properties, increased activities of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in chickpea plants, and increased plant phenol contents. These results indicate that CuO NPs have potential as effective, eco-friendly alternatives to conventional fungicides for controlling of root rot and wilt of chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO NPs at 40 ppm reduced Rhizoctonia root rot in chickpea by 61%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
CuO NPs at 40 ppme2
Interactor
RhizoctoniaRhizoctoniae2pathogen
Outcome
Rhizoctonia rote2
Direction
reductione2
Value
61%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia
Rhizoctonia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTashkoskip · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“CuO NPs at 40 ppm gave 61% reduction for Rhizoctonia rot and 65% reduction for Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–594 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO NPs at 40 ppm reduced Fusarium wilt in chickpea by 65%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
CuO NPs at 40 ppme2
Interactor
FusariumFusariume2pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium wilte2
Direction
reductione2
Value
65%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e2

“CuO NPs at 40 ppm gave 61% reduction for Rhizoctonia rot and 65% reduction for Fusarium wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–594 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All the nanoparticles had antifungal activity, with greatest effects at 40 ppm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
antifungal activitye3
Qualifier
with greatest effects at 40 ppme3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e3

“All the nanoparticles had antifungal activity, with greatest effects at 40 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO NPs gave no difference from thiophanate-methyl in reducing root rot or wilt of chickpea in vivo.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
CuO NPse4
Outcome
root rot or wilte4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
thiophanate-methyle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e4

“No differences in in vivo tests were observed between CuO NPs and thiophanate-methyl for reducing root rot or wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO NPs enhanced growth and yield of chickpea plants.

Taxon
chickpea plantsCicer arietinume5
Treatment
CuO NPse5
Outcome
growth and yielde5
Direction
enhancede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e5

“Applications of CuO NPs also enhanced growth and yield of chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO NPs increased peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities in chickpea plants.

Taxon
chickpea plantsCicer arietinume6
Treatment
CuO NPse6
Outcome
activities of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidasee6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e6

“CuO NPs had antifungal properties, increased activities of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in chickpea plants, and increased plant phenol contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1043 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO NPs increased plant phenol contents in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpea plantsCicer arietinume6
Treatment
CuO NPse6
Outcome
plant phenol contentse6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e6

“CuO NPs had antifungal properties, increased activities of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase in chickpea plants, and increased plant phenol contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1043 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that CuO NPs have potential as eco-friendly alternatives to conventional fungicides for chickpea root rot and wilt.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
potential as effective, eco-friendly alternatives to conventional fungicidese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e7

“CuO NPs have potential as effective, eco-friendly alternatives to conventional fungicides for controlling of root rot and wilt of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1211 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO NPs altered the ultrastructure of fungal mycelia.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
CuO NPse6
Outcome
ultrastructure of the fungal myceliae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Metallic oxide nanoparticles enhance chickpea resistance to root rot and wilt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
e6

“Alterations in the ultrastructure of the fungal mycelia were observed in response to treating with CuO NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–702 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

34 papers: 34 positive, 0 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.