Abstract
Maize plants (Zea mays L.) are a cultivated crop of significant importance in global food security, because they have a high nutritional value and are used in the composition of chicken, pig, cattle, and goat feed. However, the physiological potential of maize plants has not been fully explored. Micronutrients are mineral elements required by enzyme activators in the processes of obtaining energy and in the accumulation of dry matter. We examined the hypothesis that maize plants treated with a micronutrient mixture (MNM), via foliar application, will not improve plant growth and, consequently, agronomic efficiency, under field conditions without nutritional stress. The experiment was carried out using the commercial hybrid 3646YHR (Pioneer®) with the application of boron (B), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu) and molybdenum (Mo) available in the ‘Mover’ commercial product (Stoller-do-Brasil®) to the leaves of either 0.0 L.ha-1, 1.25 L.ha-1, 2.5 L.ha-1, 5.0 L.ha-1, and 7.5 L.ha-1 distributed in a randomized block experimental design. We measured plant growth parameters and also calculated physiological indexes and agronomic efficiency. The data were subjected to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and their means were compared using Tukey’s test at 5% significance (α=0.05). In summary, our findings did not show improvements in plant growth and agronomic efficiency data. Therefore, we accepted our original hypothesis (‘H0’), which suggests that mineral elements did not enhance the biological productivity and agronomic efficiency performance of our maize plants when they were not under nutritional stress. Investigation on maize leaf micronutrient mixture application is limited and so an excellent opportunity for future study
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar micronutrients did not improve maize plant growth under conditions without nutritional stress.
- Treatment
- micronutrient mixture (MNM)e1
- Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- did not show improvementse0
- Qualifier
- without nutritional stresse2
- Setting
- field conditionse2
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“our findings did not show improvements in plant growth and agronomic efficiency data”
e1“maize plants treated with a micronutrient mixture (MNM), via foliar application”
e2“under field conditions without nutritional stress”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar micronutrients did not improve maize agronomic efficiency under conditions without nutritional stress.
- Treatment
- micronutrient mixture (MNM)e1
- Outcome
- agronomic efficiencye0
- Direction
- did not show improvementse0
- Qualifier
- without nutritional stresse2
- Setting
- field conditionse2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“our findings did not show improvements in plant growth and agronomic efficiency data”
e1“maize plants treated with a micronutrient mixture (MNM), via foliar application”
e2“under field conditions without nutritional stress”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.