Paper · 2025 · Weed Technology

Cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazin

Chad C. Abbott; Nicholas J. Shay; Eric P. Prostko

14
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Trifludimoxazin is a new herbicide that inhibits protoporphyrinogen oxidase and is being evaluated for the control of small-seeded annual broadleaf weeds and grasses in several crops. Currently, no information is available regarding peanut cultivar response to trifludimoxazin and its utility in peanut weed control systems. Three unique field experiments were conducted and replicated in time from 2019 through 2022 to determine the response of seven peanut cultivars (‘AU-NPL 17’, ‘FloRun 331’, ‘GA-06G’, ‘GA-16HO’, ‘GA-18RU’, ‘GA-20VHO’, and ‘TifNV High O/L’) to preemergence applications of trifludimoxazin and to determine the efficacy of trifludimoxazin at multiple rates and tank-mixtures with acetochlor, diclosulam, dimethenamid- P , pendimethalin, and S -metolachlor for weed management. Cultivar sensitivities to trifludimoxazin were not observed. Peanut density was not reduced by any trifludimoxazin rate. Compared with nontreated controls, in 2019 when trifludimoxazin was applied at 75 g ai ha −1 , leaf necrosis increased by 18% and peanut stunting increased by 10%, and yield was reduced by 6%. However, this rate increased leaf necrosis by only 4%, stunting by 3% to 5%, and it had no negative effect on yield in 2020–2021. Generally, peanut injury from preemergence-applied trifludimoxazin was similar to or less than that observed from flumioxazin at 2 wk after application (WAA). Peanut yield in the weed control study was reduced by 11% to 12% when treated with trifludimoxazin at 150 g ha −1 (4× the standard rate) when compared to the 75 g ha −1 rate. However, yield was not different from the flumioxazin treatment. Palmer amaranth control with trifludimoxazin combinations was ≥91% at 13 WAA, wild radish control was ≥96% at 5 WAA, and annual grass control was ≥97% at 13 WAA. Peanut is sufficiently tolerant of 38 g ha −1 of trifludimoxazin, and when tank-mixed with other residual herbicides provides weed control similar to flumioxazin-based systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut cultivars did not differ in trifludimoxazin sensitivity.

Outcome
Cultivar sensitivities to trifludimoxazine0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar sensitivities to trifludimoxazin were not observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifludimoxazin did not reduce peanut density.

Treatment
trifludimoxazine0
Outcome
Peanut densitye0
Direction
not reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peanut density was not reduced by any trifludimoxazin rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75 g ai ha −1 in 2019, trifludimoxazin increased peanut leaf necrosis by 18% versus untreated controls.

Treatment
trifludimoxazin was applied at 75 g ai ha −1e0
Outcome
leaf necrosise0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
nontreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with nontreated controls, in 2019 when trifludimoxazin was applied at 75 g ai ha −1 , leaf necrosis increased by 18% and peanut stunting increased by 10%, and yield was reduced by 6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75 g ai ha −1 in 2019, trifludimoxazin increased peanut stunting by 10%.

Treatment
trifludimoxazin was applied at 75 g ai ha −1e0
Outcome
peanut stuntinge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10%e0
Comparator
nontreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with nontreated controls, in 2019 when trifludimoxazin was applied at 75 g ai ha −1 , leaf necrosis increased by 18% and peanut stunting increased by 10%, and yield was reduced by 6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 75 g ai ha −1 in 2019, trifludimoxazin reduced peanut yield by 6%.

Treatment
trifludimoxazin was applied at 75 g ai ha −1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
nontreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with nontreated controls, in 2019 when trifludimoxazin was applied at 75 g ai ha −1 , leaf necrosis increased by 18% and peanut stunting increased by 10%, and yield was reduced by 6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same rate increased leaf necrosis by 4% in 2020–2021.

Treatment
this ratee0
Outcome
leaf necrosise0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However, this rate increased leaf necrosis by only 4%, stunting by 3% to 5%, and it had no negative effect on yield in 2020–2021.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same rate increased stunting by 3% to 5% in 2020–2021.

Treatment
this ratee0
Outcome
stuntinge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3% to 5%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However, this rate increased leaf necrosis by only 4%, stunting by 3% to 5%, and it had no negative effect on yield in 2020–2021.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same rate had no negative effect on yield in 2020–2021.

Treatment
this ratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no negative effecte0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“However, this rate increased leaf necrosis by only 4%, stunting by 3% to 5%, and it had no negative effect on yield in 2020–2021.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence trifludimoxazin injury was similar to or less than flumioxazin injury at two weeks.

Treatment
preemergence-applied trifludimoxazine0
Outcome
peanut injurye0
Direction
similar to or less thane0
Comparator
flumioxazine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generally, peanut injury from preemergence-applied trifludimoxazin was similar to or less than that observed from flumioxazin at 2 wk after application (WAA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1409 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifludimoxazin at 150 g ha −1 reduced peanut yield by 11% to 12% versus 75 g ha −1.

Treatment
trifludimoxazin at 150 g ha −1e0
Outcome
Peanut yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11% to 12%e0
Comparator
75 g ha −1 ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peanut yield in the weed control study was reduced by 11% to 12% when treated with trifludimoxazin at 150 g ha −1 (4× the standard rate) when compared to the 75 g ha −1 rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield under trifludimoxazin was not different from flumioxazin.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not differente0
Comparator
flumioxazin treatmente0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, yield was not different from the flumioxazin treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1649 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifludimoxazin combinations controlled Palmer amaranth by at least 91% at 13 WAA.

Treatment
trifludimoxazin combinationse0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth controle0
Value
≥91%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Palmer amaranth control with trifludimoxazin combinations was ≥91% at 13 WAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1726 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild radish control was at least 96% at 5 WAA.

Interactor
wild radishRaphanus raphanistrume0weed
Outcome
wild radish controle0
Value
≥96%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Raphanus raphanistrum
Raphanus raphanistrum · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wild radish control was ≥96% at 5 WAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1765 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual grass control was at least 97% at 13 WAA.

Interactor
annual grasse0weed
Outcome
annual grass controle0
Value
≥97%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“annual grass control was ≥97% at 13 WAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1771–1810 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–44 · show in text ↑

trifludimoxazin · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 4 positive, 23 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.