Paper · 2025 · Plants

Real-Time Accurate Apple Detection Based on Improved YOLOv8n in Complex Natural Environments

Mingjie Wang; Fuzhong Li

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Efficient and accurate apple detection is crucial for the operation of apple-picking robots. To improve detection accuracy and speed, we propose a lightweight apple-detection model based on the YOLOv8n framework. The proposed model introduces a novel Self-Calibrated Coordinate (SCC) attention module, which enhances feature extraction, especially for partially occluded apples, by effectively capturing spatial and channel information. Additionally, we replace the C2f module within the YOLOv8n neck with a Partial Convolution Module improved with Reparameterization (PCMR), which accelerates detection, reduces redundant computations, and minimizes both parameter count and memory access during inference. To further optimize the model, we fuse multi-scale features from the second and third pyramid levels of the backbone architecture, achieving a lightweight design suitable for real-time detection. To address missed detections and misclassifications, Polynomial Loss (PolyLoss) is integrated, enhancing class discrimination for different apple subcategories. Compared to the original YOLOv8n, the improved model increases the mAP by 2.90% to 88.90% and improves the detection speed to 220 FPS, which is 30.55% faster. Additionally, it reduces the parameter count by 89.36% and the FLOPs by 2.47%. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms mainstream object-detection algorithms, including Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, SSD, RT-DETR-R18, RT-DETR-R34, YOLOv5n, YOLOv6-N, YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv8n, YOLOv9-T and YOLOv11n, in both mAP and detection speed. Notably, the improved model has been used to develop an Android application deployed on the iQOO Neo6 SE smartphone, achieving a 40 FPS detection speed, a 26.93% improvement over the corresponding deployment of YOLOv8n, enabling real-time apple detection. This study provides a valuable reference for designing efficient and lightweight detection models for resource-constrained apple-picking robots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The improved model raised apple detection mAP by 2.90% to 88.90% versus YOLOv8n.

Outcome
mAPe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2.90%e0
Qualifier
88.90%e0
Comparator
original YOLOv8ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the original YOLOv8n, the improved model increases the mAP by 2.90% to 88.90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Detection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detection speed reached 220 FPS, 30.55% faster than YOLOv8n.

Outcome
detection speede0
Direction
fastere0
Value
220 FPSe0
Qualifier
30.55%e0
Comparator
original YOLOv8ne1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improves the detection speed to 220 FPS, which is 30.55% faster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1222 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the original YOLOv8n”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Detection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model reduced parameter count by 89.36%.

Outcome
parameter counte0
Direction
reducese0
Value
89.36%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduces the parameter count by 89.36%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Detection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model reduced FLOPs by 2.47%.

Outcome
FLOPse0
Value
2.47%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the FLOPs by 2.47%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1301 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduces the parameter count by 89.36% and the FLOPs by 2.47%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1301 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Detection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model outperformed the listed object detection algorithms in mAP and speed.

Outcome
mAP and detection speede0
Direction
outperformse0
Comparator
mainstream object-detection algorithmse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proposed model outperforms mainstream object-detection algorithms, including Faster R-CNN, RetinaNet, SSD, RT-DETR-R18, RT-DETR-R34, YOLOv5n, YOLOv6-N, YOLOv7-tiny, YOLOv8n, YOLOv9-T and YOLOv11n, in both mAP and detection speed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Detection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smartphone deployment achieved 40 FPS, a 26.93% gain over YOLOv8n deployment.

Outcome
detection speede0
Direction
improvemente0
Value
40 FPSe0
Qualifier
26.93%e0
Comparator
corresponding deployment of YOLOv8ne0
Setting
iQOO Neo6 SE smartphonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“iQOO Neo6 SE smartphone, achieving a 40 FPS detection speed, a 26.93% improvement over the corresponding deployment of YOLOv8n”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1667–1793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Detection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑