Paper · 2024 · Far Eastern Agrarian Herald

Comparative assessment of use of a multifunctional tillage unit in corn cultivation technology for grain

Vladimir V. Mazur; Vladimir A. Sakharov; Alexey A. Kuvshinov

1
claims
1
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

When corn cultivation for grain, the protection of crops from weeds is an issue, especially during the period of germination and plant height gain of about 20–30 cm, when cultivated plants begin to shade and oppress weeds. The main methods of protecting corn crops are the chemical method, which consists in spraying with herbicide in several repetitions during the growing season, and the mechanical method using several row-to-row cultivations. The main disadvantage of the chemical method is the herbicidal load on the soil, which can be eliminated when using row-to-row developments by a row cultivator with a set of scientifically sound design and operating parameters. The purpose of these studies is to substantiate the increase in corn grain yield by improving the technological process of row-to-row processing of crops and by reducing the herbicidal load in the Amur region. It was found out that the use of two universal pointed paws with displacement in combination with a chisel-shaped paw and needle discs in the center of a multifunctional tillage unit for row-to-row tillage and weed eradication in wide-row corn crops ensured grain yields at the level of 9.7 t/ha without the use of chemical weed control agents.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A multifunctional row tillage unit produced 9.7 t/ha corn grain without chemical weed control.

Treatment
multifunctional tillage unite0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
at the level ofe0
Value
9.7 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two universal pointed paws with displacement in combination with a chisel-shaped paw and needle discs in the center of a multifunctional tillage unit for row-to-row tillage and weed eradication in wide-row corn crops ensured grain yields at the level of 9.7 t/ha without the use of chemical weed control agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1228 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.