Paper · 2025 · Environmental Technology & Innovation

The synergistic effect of extracellular polysaccharide-producing salt-tolerant bacteria and biochar promotes grape growth under saline-alkaline stress

Yeqi Li; Jiqiang Zhang; Xindong Wang; et al.

15
claims
38
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Grapes ( Vitis vinifera ) are a vital economic crop worldwide but are severely threatened by soil salinization and alkalization. While extracellular polysaccharides are known to improve soil conditions, it remains unclear how rhizosphere microorganisms that can produce extracellular polysaccharides enhance the tolerance of plants to salt-alkali conditions. This study selected Bacillus subtilis B4 and Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 based on their high levels of production of extracellular polysaccharides and subjected them to pot and field experiments. Our results demonstrated that both strains significantly promoted the growth of grape shoots, reduced the salinity of soil, and increased the levels of phosphorus and potassium in both the plants and soil. Compared to traditional B. subtilis , B9 performed better, and this was further enhanced when the strain was co-applied with biochar. 16S rRNA high-throughput sequencing was used to show that the combination of bacteria and biochar reshaped the native rhizosphere microbial community, altered its functional abundances, and improved the properties of soil, thus, ultimately promoting plant growth and enhancing salt-alkali tolerance. This study expands the microbial species available to improve the tolerance of grape to salt and ameliorate the saline-alkaline soils, thus, providing a theoretical basis for the combined application of microbial inoculants and biochar. • Microorganisms and biochar improved the physicochemical properties of the soil and promoted plant growth. • Microbial inoculants and biochar can reconstruct rhizosphere microbial communities. • The single-factor microbial network showed an increase in positive correlations. • The combined application of microbial inoculants and biochar is more effective than their individual application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis B4 significantly promoted grape shoot growth.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis B4e1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis B4Bacillus subtilise1symbiont
Outcome
growth of grape shootse2
Direction
promotede2
Setting
pot and field experimentse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study selected Bacillus subtilis B4 and Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 based on their high levels of production of extracellular polysaccharides and subjected them to pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–553 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results demonstrated that both strains significantly promoted the growth of grape shoots, reduced the salinity of soil, and increased the levels of phosphorus and potassium in both the plants and soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 significantly promoted grape shoot growth.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Pseudomonas resinovorans B9e1
Interactor
Pseudomonas resinovorans B9Metapseudomonas resinovoranse1symbiont
Outcome
growth of grape shootse2
Direction
promotede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study selected Bacillus subtilis B4 and Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 based on their high levels of production of extracellular polysaccharides and subjected them to pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–553 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results demonstrated that both strains significantly promoted the growth of grape shoots, reduced the salinity of soil, and increased the levels of phosphorus and potassium in both the plants and soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis B4 reduced soil salinity.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis B4e1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis B4Bacillus subtilise1symbiont
Outcome
salinity of soile2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study selected Bacillus subtilis B4 and Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 based on their high levels of production of extracellular polysaccharides and subjected them to pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–553 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results demonstrated that both strains significantly promoted the growth of grape shoots, reduced the salinity of soil, and increased the levels of phosphorus and potassium in both the plants and soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 reduced soil salinity.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Pseudomonas resinovorans B9e1
Interactor
Pseudomonas resinovorans B9Metapseudomonas resinovoranse1symbiont
Outcome
salinity of soile2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study selected Bacillus subtilis B4 and Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 based on their high levels of production of extracellular polysaccharides and subjected them to pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–553 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results demonstrated that both strains significantly promoted the growth of grape shoots, reduced the salinity of soil, and increased the levels of phosphorus and potassium in both the plants and soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus subtilis B4 increased phosphorus and potassium levels in plants and soil.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
plants and soile2
Treatment
Bacillus subtilis B4e1
Interactor
Bacillus subtilis B4Bacillus subtilise1symbiont
Outcome
levels of phosphorus and potassiume2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study selected Bacillus subtilis B4 and Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 based on their high levels of production of extracellular polysaccharides and subjected them to pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–553 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results demonstrated that both strains significantly promoted the growth of grape shoots, reduced the salinity of soil, and increased the levels of phosphorus and potassium in both the plants and soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 increased phosphorus and potassium levels in plants and soil.

Taxon
grapet0
Organ / stage
plants and soile2
Treatment
Pseudomonas resinovorans B9e1
Interactor
Pseudomonas resinovorans B9Metapseudomonas resinovoranse1symbiont
Outcome
levels of phosphorus and potassiume2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study selected Bacillus subtilis B4 and Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 based on their high levels of production of extracellular polysaccharides and subjected them to pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–553 · show in text ↑
e2

“Our results demonstrated that both strains significantly promoted the growth of grape shoots, reduced the salinity of soil, and increased the levels of phosphorus and potassium in both the plants and soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 performed better than traditional Bacillus subtilis.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
B9e3
Interactor
Pseudomonas resinovorans B9Metapseudomonas resinovoranse1symbiont
Second interactor
B. subtilisBacillus subtilise3symbiont
Outcome
performed bettere3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
B. subtilise3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study selected Bacillus subtilis B4 and Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 based on their high levels of production of extracellular polysaccharides and subjected them to pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–553 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to traditional B. subtilis , B9 performed better, and this was further enhanced when the strain was co-applied with biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-application of B9 with biochar further enhanced its performance.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
co-applied with biochare3
Interactor
Pseudomonas resinovorans B9Metapseudomonas resinovoranse1symbiont
Outcome
performed bettere3
Direction
further enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“This study selected Bacillus subtilis B4 and Pseudomonas resinovorans B9 based on their high levels of production of extracellular polysaccharides and subjected them to pot and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–553 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to traditional B. subtilis , B9 performed better, and this was further enhanced when the strain was co-applied with biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacteria and biochar reshaped the native rhizosphere microbial community.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combination of bacteria and biochare4
Interactor
bacteriaBacteriae4symbiont
Outcome
native rhizosphere microbial communitye4
Qualifier
reshapede4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“the combination of bacteria and biochar reshaped the native rhizosphere microbial community, altered its functional abundances, and improved the properties of soil, thus, ultimately promoting plant growth and enhancing salt-alkali tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacteria and biochar altered the functional abundances of the rhizosphere microbial community.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combination of bacteria and biochare4
Outcome
functional abundancese4
Qualifier
alterede4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“the combination of bacteria and biochar reshaped the native rhizosphere microbial community, altered its functional abundances, and improved the properties of soil, thus, ultimately promoting plant growth and enhancing salt-alkali tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacteria and biochar improved soil properties.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combination of bacteria and biochare4
Outcome
properties of soile4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“the combination of bacteria and biochar reshaped the native rhizosphere microbial community, altered its functional abundances, and improved the properties of soil, thus, ultimately promoting plant growth and enhancing salt-alkali tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacteria and biochar promoted plant growth.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combination of bacteria and biochare4
Outcome
plant growthe4
Direction
promotinge4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“the combination of bacteria and biochar reshaped the native rhizosphere microbial community, altered its functional abundances, and improved the properties of soil, thus, ultimately promoting plant growth and enhancing salt-alkali tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined bacteria and biochar enhanced salt-alkali tolerance.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combination of bacteria and biochare4
Outcome
salt-alkali tolerancee4
Direction
enhancinge4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“the combination of bacteria and biochar reshaped the native rhizosphere microbial community, altered its functional abundances, and improved the properties of soil, thus, ultimately promoting plant growth and enhancing salt-alkali tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application of microbial inoculants and biochar was more effective than their individual application.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
combined application of microbial inoculants and biochare5
Outcome
effectivee5
Direction
more effectivee5
Comparator
their individual applicatione5

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e5

“The combined application of microbial inoculants and biochar is more effective than their individual application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1711–1823 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The single-factor microbial network showed an increase in positive correlations.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
single-factore6
Outcome
positive correlationse6
Direction
increasee6

Verbatim

t0

“promotes grape growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–121 · show in text ↑
e6

“The single-factor microbial network showed an increase in positive correlations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1707 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

46 papers: 28 positive, 18 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

inoculation · disease · VitisPositive and negative results

67 papers: 19 positive, 48 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

biochar · disease · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

biochar · growth · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.