Paper · 2025 · Environmental Research Communications

Soil properties and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L) growth, yield and quality as affected by tillage systems, crop rotation and nitrogen fertilization under semi-arid climatic conditions

Mouna Mechri; Afef Othmani; Taqi Raza; et al.

12
claims
31
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Adopting sustainable agricultural practices is considered as an effective strategy to mitigate climate change and to improve soil health and crop production.This study aims to assess the impact of tillage systems (no-tillage (NT) and conventional tillage (CT)), crop rotation (faba beans - oat and faba beans - durum wheat) and nitrogen fertilization rates (0, 20 and 40 kg N.ha −1 ) on soil properties and growth and yield of fenugreek. Soil samples were collected at two stages: at the 50% blossoming stage and after harvest and fenugreek quality and yield and its components were measured.The results showed that tillage systems and crop rotation treatments had great influence on soil properties. In general, the highest soil organic carbon (SOC) (13.4 and 14.2 g.kg −1 ), total nitrogen (1.0 and 1.1 g.kg −1 ), nitric nitrogen (75.73 and 62.42 mg.kg −1 ), ammonium-nitrogen (14.90 and 19.08 mg.kg −1 ). were recorded in no tillage practice with durum as a previous crop at 50% blossoming and harvest stage respectively. Exception for SOC, the highest nitrogen fertilization rate improved most of soil variables at both growth stages. Greater biomass and grain protein content were obtained under NT system and 40 kg N.ha −1 . Previous crops had no effect on grain protein content. Also, there was a significant synergy among soil fertility and fenugreek production. Conservation tillage, durum wheat previous crop and highest nitrogen fertilization rate gave the best aboveground biomass, yield and yield attributes performances. Overall, NT associated with durum wheat as a previous crop and nitrogen fertilization (40 kg N.ha −1 ) are the suitable combination to improve both soil quality, and fenugreek yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage after durum produced the highest soil organic carbon at blossoming and harvest.

Treatment
no tillage practice with durum as a previous crope1
Outcome
soil organic carbon (SOC)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.4 and 14.2 g.kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest soil organic carbon (SOC) (13.4 and 14.2 g.kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“no tillage practice with durum as a previous crop at 50% blossoming and harvest stage respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage after durum produced the highest total soil nitrogen at blossoming and harvest.

Treatment
no tillage practice with durum as a previous crope1
Outcome
total nitrogene0
Direction
higheste2
Value
1.0 and 1.1 g.kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total nitrogen (1.0 and 1.1 g.kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“no tillage practice with durum as a previous crop at 50% blossoming and harvest stage respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1032 · show in text ↑
e2

“highest soil organic carbon (SOC) (13.4 and 14.2 g.kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage after durum produced the highest nitric soil nitrogen at blossoming and harvest.

Treatment
no tillage practice with durum as a previous crope1
Outcome
nitric nitrogene0
Direction
higheste2
Value
75.73 and 62.42 mg.kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitric nitrogen (75.73 and 62.42 mg.kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“no tillage practice with durum as a previous crop at 50% blossoming and harvest stage respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1032 · show in text ↑
e2

“highest soil organic carbon (SOC) (13.4 and 14.2 g.kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage after durum produced the highest ammonium soil nitrogen at blossoming and harvest.

Treatment
no tillage practice with durum as a previous crope1
Outcome
ammonium-nitrogene0
Direction
higheste2
Value
14.90 and 19.08 mg.kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ammonium-nitrogen (14.90 and 19.08 mg.kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
e1

“no tillage practice with durum as a previous crop at 50% blossoming and harvest stage respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1032 · show in text ↑
e2

“highest soil organic carbon (SOC) (13.4 and 14.2 g.kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen rate improved most soil variables except organic carbon at both stages.

Treatment
highest nitrogen fertilization ratee0
Outcome
soil variablese0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
Exception for SOCe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exception for SOC, the highest nitrogen fertilization rate improved most of soil variables at both growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1146 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage with 40 kg N.ha−1 increased fenugreek biomass.

Treatment
NT system and 40 kg N.ha −1e0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
Greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater biomass and grain protein content were obtained under NT system and 40 kg N.ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage with 40 kg N.ha−1 increased fenugreek grain protein content.

Treatment
NT system and 40 kg N.ha −1e0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
Greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater biomass and grain protein content were obtained under NT system and 40 kg N.ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Previous crops had no effect on fenugreek grain protein content.

Treatment
Previous cropse0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Previous crops had no effect on grain protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil fertility and fenugreek production had a significant positive relationship.

Outcome
fenugreek productione0
Setting
soil fertilitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was a significant synergy among soil fertility and fenugreek production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage with durum as the prior crop and the highest nitrogen rate gave the best aboveground biomass.

Treatment
Conservation tillage, durum wheat previous crop and highest nitrogen fertilization ratee0
Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conservation tillage, durum wheat previous crop and highest nitrogen fertilization rate gave the best aboveground biomass, yield and yield attributes performances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1542 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment combination gave the best fenugreek yield and yield attributes.

Treatment
Conservation tillage, durum wheat previous crop and highest nitrogen fertilization ratee0
Outcome
yield and yield attributese0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conservation tillage, durum wheat previous crop and highest nitrogen fertilization rate gave the best aboveground biomass, yield and yield attributes performances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1542 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend no tillage after durum wheat with 40 kg N.ha−1 to improve soil quality and fenugreek yield.

Outcome
NT associated with durum wheat as a previous crop and nitrogen fertilization (40 kg N.ha −1 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trigonella foenum-graecum
Trigonella foenum-graecum · TaxonYak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NT associated with durum wheat as a previous crop and nitrogen fertilization (40 kg N.ha −1 ) are the suitable combination to improve both soil quality, and fenugreek yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“fenugreek”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–29 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 59 positive, 1 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

tillage · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · yield · Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.