Paper · 2025 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Impact of Bentazon Herbicide Spray Rate and Row Spacing on the Growth of Faba Bean Crop and Associated Weeds

Y A Mohammed; A J Jihad

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The growth parameters of faba bean and companion weeds were studied during an applied field experiment conducted at the University of Al-Anbar - College of Agriculture at Al-Hamidiah Research Station in the winter grown season of 2020–2021 using four weed control treatments (the weed-free treatment, a weedy check treatment, and two rates of Bentazon spray dose (which were 1 and 2 liters per hectare). Another studied factor was three-row spacing between plants along the grown line (40, 50, and 60 centimeters). The experiment employed a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) and was configured as a Split Plot Design with three replications—row spacing in the sub-plots and weed control treatments in the main plots. The results demonstrated that the weed control treatments substantially affected the weed density and growth features of the bean crop. A two-liter ha −1 application of Bentazon was significantly more effective than the weedy treatment for reducing the density of weeds down to 19.86 plants m-2, which was reflected positively across all growth metrics. Compared to the distance of 60 cm, which gave the highest average leaf area of 3882 cm 2 plant −1 , dry weight of the roots, and number of branches per plant, the distance of 40 cm was significantly superior in reducing the weed density to 42.57 plants m −2 and increasing the plant height and leaf area index (3.22). (5.90 branch plant −1 ). There was no statistically significant impact on all of the qualities we looked at from the interaction between the two study components.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon at two liters per hectare significantly reduced weed density relative to the weedy treatment to 19.86 plants m-2.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
two-liter ha −1 application of Bentazone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
density of weedse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
19.86 plants m-2e0
Comparator
weedy treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-liter ha −1 application of Bentazon was significantly more effective than the weedy treatment for reducing the density of weeds down to 19.86 plants m-2, which was reflected positively across all growth metrics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bentazon at two liters per hectare improved bean growth metrics relative to the weedy treatment.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
two-liter ha −1 application of Bentazone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
growth metricse0
Direction
positivelye0
Comparator
weedy treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-liter ha −1 application of Bentazon was significantly more effective than the weedy treatment for reducing the density of weeds down to 19.86 plants m-2, which was reflected positively across all growth metrics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60 cm spacing gave the highest average bean leaf area of 3882 cm 2 plant −1.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
distance of 60 cme0
Outcome
average leaf areae0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3882 cm 2 plant −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the distance of 60 cm, which gave the highest average leaf area of 3882 cm 2 plant −1 , dry weight of the roots, and number of branches per plant, the distance of 40 cm was significantly superior in reducing the weed density to 42.57 plants m −2 and increasing the plant height and leaf area index (3.22). (5.90 branch plant −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60 cm spacing gave the highest bean root dry weight and branch count.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
distance of 60 cme0
Outcome
dry weight of the roots, and number of branches per plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the distance of 60 cm, which gave the highest average leaf area of 3882 cm 2 plant −1 , dry weight of the roots, and number of branches per plant, the distance of 40 cm was significantly superior in reducing the weed density to 42.57 plants m −2 and increasing the plant height and leaf area index (3.22). (5.90 branch plant −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 40 cm spacing significantly reduced weed density relative to 60 cm, to 42.57 plants m −2.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
distance of 40 cme0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
42.57 plants m −2e0
Comparator
distance of 60 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the distance of 60 cm, which gave the highest average leaf area of 3882 cm 2 plant −1 , dry weight of the roots, and number of branches per plant, the distance of 40 cm was significantly superior in reducing the weed density to 42.57 plants m −2 and increasing the plant height and leaf area index (3.22). (5.90 branch plant −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 40 cm spacing increased bean height relative to 60 cm.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
distance of 40 cme0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
distance of 60 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the distance of 60 cm, which gave the highest average leaf area of 3882 cm 2 plant −1 , dry weight of the roots, and number of branches per plant, the distance of 40 cm was significantly superior in reducing the weed density to 42.57 plants m −2 and increasing the plant height and leaf area index (3.22). (5.90 branch plant −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 40 cm spacing increased bean leaf area index to 3.22 relative to 60 cm.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
distance of 40 cme0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
3.22e0
Comparator
distance of 60 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the distance of 60 cm, which gave the highest average leaf area of 3882 cm 2 plant −1 , dry weight of the roots, and number of branches per plant, the distance of 40 cm was significantly superior in reducing the weed density to 42.57 plants m −2 and increasing the plant height and leaf area index (3.22). (5.90 branch plant −1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1428 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction between weed control treatment and row spacing did not significantly affect the studied traits.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
interaction between the two study componentse0
Outcome
all of the qualities we looked ate0
Direction
no statistically significant impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no statistically significant impact on all of the qualities we looked at from the interaction between the two study components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1566 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–87 · show in text ↑

bentazone · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

bentazone · weed · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.