Paper · 2025 · BMC Plant Biology

Grafting Tomato ‘Nairouz F1’ onto Interspecific Hybrids for Induced Antibiosis and Antixenosis Resistance to Tetranychus urticae Koch via Chlorogenic Acid Synthesis

Ahmed M. A. Mahmoud; Ayman H. Mabrouk; Abd-Allah Afifi; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background This study is the first research to investigate the potential of grafting to induce tomato resistance to two-spotted spider mite (TSSM), Tetranychus urticae Koch. TSSM can cause up to 50% yield loss of tomato. The grafting technique permits the rapid adoption of biotic/abiotic stress resistance/tolerance from wild relatives as rootstock while preserving the scion’s important horticultural characteristics. Although TSSM resistance is found in wild tomato relatives, particularly those with the Mi-1 gene, its effects as rootstocks on TSSM resistance remain uncertain. Tomato ‘Nairouz F 1 ’ (lacking Mi-1 ) grafted onto six interspecific hybrids with Solanum habrochiates (harboring Mi-1/mi-1 ), including commercial rootstock ‘Estamino’ and ‘Fortamino’, along with hybrids between tomato ‘VFN-14’ and each of S. habrochiates AusTRCF312064 (R312064), AusTRCF312344 (R312344), CGN15391 (R15391), and LA1777 (R1777). In the 2019 and 2020 fall seasons, the grafted and ungrafted plants were assessed in a naturally TSSM-infested field. The population of TSSM movable stages on grafted and ungrafted plants was estimated one week after transplanting, and every two weeks for 11 weeks. To assess antixenosis and antibiosis resistance in tomato grafts, TSSM males and females were reared on leaves of grafts onto R312064 and R15391, along with ungrafted plants. TSSM bio-behaviors and two-sex life table parameters were assessed. Results Grafting onto interspecific hybrids, particularly R15391, R312064, and R312344, significantly lowered TSSM populations compared to commercial rootstocks and ungrafted plants. HPLC analysis revealed that grafting induced foliar synthesis of herbivore-repellent (antixenosis) and antibiosis phenolics, viz., chlorogenic acid in all grafts and syringic acid, pyrocatechol, and vanillin in certain grafts. Grafts-R312064 showed delayed TSSM development, lower survival rates, lower fecundity, and higher mortality. Grafts-R312064 also had a longer mean generation time ( GT ; 23.33 days) and a lower reproductive rate ( R 0 : 14.63), leading to a slower intrinsic population growth rate ( r m : 0.115) compared to ungrafted plants and grafts-R15391. Conclusion The findings suggest tomato grafting onto rootstocks with the Mi-1 gene, particularly R312064, could reduce TSSM populations through induced antixenosis and antibiosis resistance mechanisms.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting onto interspecific hybrids significantly lowered TSSM populations compared with commercial rootstocks and ungrafted plants.

Material
R15391, R312064, and R312344e0
Treatment
Grafting onto interspecific hybridse0
Interactor
TSSMe0pest
Outcome
TSSM populationse0
Direction
lowerede0
Comparator
commercial rootstocks and ungrafted plantse0
Setting
naturally TSSM-infested fielde1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grafting onto interspecific hybrids, particularly R15391, R312064, and R312344, significantly lowered TSSM populations compared to commercial rootstocks and ungrafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1627 · show in text ↑
e1

“the grafted and ungrafted plants were assessed in a naturally TSSM-infested field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting induced foliar synthesis of chlorogenic acid in all grafts.

Treatment
graftinge2
Outcome
chlorogenic acide2
Direction
inducede2
Qualifier
in all graftse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e2

“HPLC analysis revealed that grafting induced foliar synthesis of herbivore-repellent (antixenosis) and antibiosis phenolics, viz., chlorogenic acid in all grafts and syringic acid, pyrocatechol, and vanillin in certain grafts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting induced foliar synthesis of syringic acid, pyrocatechol and vanillin in certain grafts.

Treatment
graftinge2
Outcome
syringic acid, pyrocatechol, and vanilline2
Direction
inducede2
Qualifier
in certain graftse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e2

“HPLC analysis revealed that grafting induced foliar synthesis of herbivore-repellent (antixenosis) and antibiosis phenolics, viz., chlorogenic acid in all grafts and syringic acid, pyrocatechol, and vanillin in certain grafts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1629–1854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafts onto R312064 delayed TSSM development.

Material
R312064e3
Treatment
Grafts-R312064e3
Interactor
TSSMe3pest
Outcome
TSSM developmente3
Direction
delayede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grafts-R312064 showed delayed TSSM development, lower survival rates, lower fecundity, and higher mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–1963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafts onto R312064 lowered TSSM survival rates.

Material
R312064e3
Treatment
Grafts-R312064e3
Interactor
TSSMe3pest
Outcome
survival ratese3
Direction
lowere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grafts-R312064 showed delayed TSSM development, lower survival rates, lower fecundity, and higher mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–1963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafts onto R312064 lowered TSSM fecundity.

Material
R312064e3
Treatment
Grafts-R312064e3
Interactor
TSSMe3pest
Outcome
fecunditye3
Direction
lowere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grafts-R312064 showed delayed TSSM development, lower survival rates, lower fecundity, and higher mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–1963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafts onto R312064 raised TSSM mortality.

Material
R312064e3
Treatment
Grafts-R312064e3
Interactor
TSSMe3pest
Outcome
mortalitye3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grafts-R312064 showed delayed TSSM development, lower survival rates, lower fecundity, and higher mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–1963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafts onto R312064 lengthened the mean generation time of TSSM to 23.33 days.

Material
R312064e4
Treatment
Grafts-R312064e4
Outcome
mean generation timee4
Direction
longere4
Value
23.33 dayse4
Comparator
ungrafted plants and grafts-R15391e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grafts-R312064 also had a longer mean generation time ( GT ; 23.33 days) and a lower reproductive rate ( R 0 : 14.63), leading to a slower intrinsic population growth rate ( r m : 0.115) compared to ungrafted plants and grafts-R15391”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafts onto R312064 lowered the reproductive rate of TSSM to R0 14.63.

Material
R312064e4
Treatment
Grafts-R312064e4
Outcome
reproductive ratee4
Direction
lowere4
Value
14.63e4
Comparator
ungrafted plants and grafts-R15391e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grafts-R312064 also had a longer mean generation time ( GT ; 23.33 days) and a lower reproductive rate ( R 0 : 14.63), leading to a slower intrinsic population growth rate ( r m : 0.115) compared to ungrafted plants and grafts-R15391”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafts onto R312064 slowed the intrinsic population growth rate of TSSM to 0.115.

Material
R312064e4
Treatment
Grafts-R312064e4
Outcome
intrinsic population growth ratee4
Direction
slowere4
Value
0.115e4
Comparator
ungrafted plants and grafts-R15391e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grafts-R312064 also had a longer mean generation time ( GT ; 23.33 days) and a lower reproductive rate ( R 0 : 14.63), leading to a slower intrinsic population growth rate ( r m : 0.115) compared to ungrafted plants and grafts-R15391”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2198 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato grafting onto Mi-1 rootstocks, particularly R312064, could reduce TSSM populations through induced antixenosis and antibiosis resistance mechanisms.

Material
R312064e5
Interactor
TSSMe5pest
Gene
Mi-1e5
Outcome
TSSM populationse5
Qualifier
through induced antixenosis and antibiosis resistance mechanismse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grafting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 · show in text ↑
e5

“tomato grafting onto rootstocks with the Mi-1 gene, particularly R312064, could reduce TSSM populations through induced antixenosis and antibiosis resistance mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2232–2400 · show in text ↑

grafting · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

grafting · survival · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

grafting · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 72 positive, 11 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

grafting · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.