Paper · 2025 · Indian Journal of Soil Conservation

Impact of residue management practices of rice on growth, productivity and soil physical properties of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties in Indo-Gangetic plains of India

Kamaljeet Singh; Balwinder Singh Dhillon

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rice residues are important natural resources and recycling of these residues improves the soil physical, chemical and biological properties. Management of rice straw is a major challenge as it is considered to be a poor feed for the animals. The field experiment was conducted on effect of rice residue incorporation on barley productivity and soil physical properties at Research Farm of University College of Agriculture, Bathinda during rabi season of 2019-20. The trail was laid out in split plot design with two barley varieties (V -'PL 807' and V -'DWRB 123') in main plots and five levels of 1 2 rice residue incorporation (0, 5, 7.5, 10 and 12.5 t ha-1) in sub plots and replicated thrice. Barley variety 'PL 807' recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear, 1000-seed weight and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than 'DWRB 123'. Barley varieties 'PL 807' recorded 17.53% higher grain yield than 'DWRB 123'. Rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than other treatments of residue incorporations. Grain yield obtained with rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 found 14.64%, 10.38%, 6.76%, 12.73% higher than 0, 5, 10, 12.5 t ha-1, respectively. The soil water content and saturated soil water content markedly increased with residue incorporation treatments compared with control. Residue incorporation significantly decreased the soil bulk density in all incorporation treatments compared with control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley variety 'PL 807' had higher plant height, dry matter and number of tillers than 'DWRB 123'.

Material
PL 807e1
Outcome
plant height, dry matter, number of tillerse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
DWRB 123e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Barley variety 'PL 807' recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear, 1000-seed weight and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than 'DWRB 123'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–999 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley variety 'PL 807' had higher leaf area index than 'DWRB 123'.

Material
PL 807e1
Outcome
leaf area indexe1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
DWRB 123e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Barley variety 'PL 807' recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear, 1000-seed weight and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than 'DWRB 123'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–999 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley variety 'PL 807' had higher numbers of effective tillers and grains per ear and higher 1000-seed weight than 'DWRB 123'.

Material
PL 807e1
Outcome
number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear, 1000-seed weighte1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
DWRB 123e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Barley variety 'PL 807' recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear, 1000-seed weight and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than 'DWRB 123'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–999 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley variety 'PL 807' had higher grain, straw and biological yield than 'DWRB 123'.

Material
PL 807e1
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield and biological yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
DWRB 123e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“Barley variety 'PL 807' recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear, 1000-seed weight and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than 'DWRB 123'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–999 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley variety 'PL 807' yielded 17.53% more grain than 'DWRB 123'.

Material
PL 807e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
17.53%e2
Comparator
DWRB 123e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e2

“Barley varieties 'PL 807' recorded 17.53% higher grain yield than 'DWRB 123'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1077 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice residue incorporation at 7.5 t/ha gave higher plant height, dry matter and number of tillers than other residue treatments.

Treatment
Rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1e3
Outcome
plant height, dry matter, number of tillerse3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other treatments of residue incorporationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than other treatments of residue incorporations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice residue incorporation at 7.5 t/ha gave higher leaf area index than other residue treatments.

Treatment
Rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1e3
Outcome
leaf area indexe3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other treatments of residue incorporationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than other treatments of residue incorporations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice residue incorporation at 7.5 t/ha gave higher numbers of effective tillers and grains per ear than other residue treatments.

Treatment
Rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1e3
Outcome
number of effective tillers, number of grains/eare3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other treatments of residue incorporationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than other treatments of residue incorporations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice residue incorporation at 7.5 t/ha gave higher grain, straw and biological yield than other residue treatments.

Treatment
Rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1e3
Outcome
grain yield, straw yield and biological yielde3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
other treatments of residue incorporationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 recorded higher growth attributes viz., plant height, dry matter, number of tillers, leaf area index and dry matter and yield attributes viz., number of effective tillers, number of grains/ear and grain yield, straw yield and biological yield than other treatments of residue incorporations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield with 7.5 t/ha residue incorporation was 14.64% higher than with 0 t/ha.

Treatment
rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1e4
Outcome
Grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
14.64%e4
Comparator
0e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain yield obtained with rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 found 14.64%, 10.38%, 6.76%, 12.73% higher than 0, 5, 10, 12.5 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield with 7.5 t/ha residue incorporation was 10.38% higher than with 5 t/ha.

Treatment
rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1e4
Outcome
Grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
10.38%e4
Comparator
5e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain yield obtained with rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 found 14.64%, 10.38%, 6.76%, 12.73% higher than 0, 5, 10, 12.5 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield with 7.5 t/ha residue incorporation was 6.76% higher than with 10 t/ha.

Treatment
rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1e4
Outcome
Grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
6.76%e4
Comparator
10e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain yield obtained with rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 found 14.64%, 10.38%, 6.76%, 12.73% higher than 0, 5, 10, 12.5 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield with 7.5 t/ha residue incorporation was 12.73% higher than with 12.5 t/ha.

Treatment
rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1e4
Outcome
Grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
12.73%e4
Comparator
12.5 t ha-1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain yield obtained with rice residue incorporation of 7.5 t ha-1 found 14.64%, 10.38%, 6.76%, 12.73% higher than 0, 5, 10, 12.5 t ha-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1562 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation significantly decreased soil bulk density compared with control.

Treatment
Residue incorporatione5
Outcome
soil bulk densitye5
Direction
decreasede5
Comparator
controle5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e5

“Residue incorporation significantly decreased the soil bulk density in all incorporation treatments compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation markedly increased soil water content and saturated soil water content compared with control.

Treatment
residue incorporation treatmentse6
Outcome
soil water content and saturated soil water contente6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
markedlye6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–130 · show in text ↑
e6

“The soil water content and saturated soil water content markedly increased with residue incorporation treatments compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1698 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Oryza sativa · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

organic · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

organic · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 29 positive, 7 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

organic · soil: physics · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.