Paper · 2013 · Korean Journal of Crop Science

Desalinization of Flooding Periods and Growth of Whole Crop Barley as Early Exposure Area in 'Saemangeum' Newly Reclaimed Land

Weon-Young Choi; Tae-Hwa Song; Sun Kim; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

본 연구에서는 새만금 지역에 조성된 신간척지 포장에서 담수와 하작물 재배처리가 제염 및 후작으로 재배한 청보리의 생육 및 수량에 미치는 영향을 조사 분석하여, 신간척지 포장의 조기제염 기술을 개발하고자 하였다. 1. 담수기간별 하작물 재배후 청보리 입모를 보면 무담수에서 $m^2$당 216개로 입모율 25%, 1개월 담수 43%, 2개월과 3개월 담수 58%, 벼 재배구는 60% 이었다. 2. 토양염농도는 청보리 파종 시에 무담수 처리에서 0.50%로 높았고, 그 외 담수처리에서는 0.2% 이내로 낮았으며, 생육 중기까지는 높아지다가 생육후기에는 파종시의 수준과 비슷하였다. 3. 초장과 간장은 담수기간이 길수록 많았으며, 경수도 많아지는 경향이었다. 4. 수량은 무담수에서는 극히 적었으며, 담수기간이 길수록 수량은 급격히 증가하여, 무담수 대비 3개월 담수에서 504%, 벼 재배에서는 536% 증수하였다. 5. 사료가치는 담수 1개월은 단백질함량과 섬유소함량이 낮게 나타났고, 담수 3개월은 벼 재배구와 사료가치 면에서 비슷한 결과를 보였다. 이상의 결과를 종합하여 볼 때, 새로 조성된 간척지(사양토)에서 제염을 목적으로 담수할 경우 3개월 이상 담수하거나 벼를 재배하여 제염을 하고 밭작물(청보리)을 재배하여야 어느 정도 수량을 얻을 수 있을 것으로 판단된다. This study was conducted to investigate upland crop at reclaimed sand land 'Saemangeum' for early desalination purpose and to investigate the growth and yield of whole crop barley, which was acceded after summer crop of corn and rice. Seedling establishment of whole crop barley were 216 seedlings/$m^2$(25%) for non-flooding, 43% for 1 month and 58% for 2, 3 month flooding. And it was 60% in rice cultivation. Soil salt concentration was 0.5% in non-flooding treatment, however flooding treatments decreased to 0.2% or less. In general soil salt concentration increased until the middle stage of growing, then became to similar level as the seeding time. Plant height, stem length and number of tiller were increased with flooding treatment. Whole crop barley yield was significantly reduced in non-flooding treatment but rapidly increased by flooding treatment. Yielding at 3 months increased by 504% compared to non-flooding, and rice cultivation was also increased by 536%. Protein and fiber content was low in 1 month flooding treatment, 3 months flooding and rice cultivation showed the similar results in terms of feed value. For desalination purpose in reclaimed land, 3 months flooding treatments of rice cultivation could result in higher yielding for upland crop, such as whole crop barley.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling establishment of whole crop barley was 216 seedlings per square metre (25%) without flooding.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
non-floodinge0
Outcome
Seedling establishmente0
Value
216 seedlings/$m^2$(25%)e0

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seedling establishment of whole crop barley were 216 seedlings/$m^2$(25%) for non-flooding, 43% for 1 month and 58% for 2, 3 month flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1032 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling establishment of whole crop barley was 43% after 1 month of flooding.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
1 monthe0
Outcome
Seedling establishmente0
Value
43%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seedling establishment of whole crop barley were 216 seedlings/$m^2$(25%) for non-flooding, 43% for 1 month and 58% for 2, 3 month flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1032 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling establishment of whole crop barley was 58% after 2 or 3 months of flooding.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
2, 3 month floodinge0
Outcome
Seedling establishmente0
Value
58%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seedling establishment of whole crop barley were 216 seedlings/$m^2$(25%) for non-flooding, 43% for 1 month and 58% for 2, 3 month flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1032 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling establishment of whole crop barley was 60% after rice cultivation.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
rice cultivatione1
Outcome
Seedling establishmente0
Value
60%e1

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seedling establishment of whole crop barley were 216 seedlings/$m^2$(25%) for non-flooding, 43% for 1 month and 58% for 2, 3 month flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“it was 60% in rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil salt concentration was 0.5% without flooding and decreased to 0.2% or less with flooding treatments.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
flooding treatmentse0
Outcome
Soil salt concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.2% or lesse0
Comparator
non-flooding treatmente0

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Soil salt concentration was 0.5% in non-flooding treatment, however flooding treatments decreased to 0.2% or less”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, stem length and number of tillers of whole crop barley increased with flooding treatment.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
flooding treatmente0
Outcome
Plant height, stem length and number of tillere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant height, stem length and number of tiller were increased with flooding treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole crop barley yield was significantly reduced without flooding but increased rapidly with flooding.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
flooding treatmente0
Outcome
Whole crop barley yielde0
Direction
rapidly increasede0
Comparator
non-flooding treatmente0

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Whole crop barley yield was significantly reduced in non-flooding treatment but rapidly increased by flooding treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole crop barley yield after 3 months of flooding was 504% higher than without flooding.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
3 monthse0
Outcome
Yieldinge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
504%e0
Comparator
non-floodinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yielding at 3 months increased by 504% compared to non-flooding, and rice cultivation was also increased by 536%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole crop barley yield after rice cultivation increased by 536%.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
rice cultivatione0
Outcome
Yieldinge0
Direction
increasede0
Value
536%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Yielding at 3 months increased by 504% compared to non-flooding, and rice cultivation was also increased by 536%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1635 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein and fiber content of whole crop barley was low after 1 month of flooding.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
1 month flooding treatmente0
Outcome
Protein and fiber contente0
Direction
lowe0

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“Protein and fiber content was low in 1 month flooding treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1700 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feed value of whole crop barley after 3 months of flooding was similar to that after rice cultivation.

Taxon
Whole Crop Barleyt0
Treatment
3 months flooding and rice cultivatione0
Outcome
feed valuee0
Direction
similare0

Verbatim

t0

“Whole Crop Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–66 · show in text ↑
e0

“3 months flooding and rice cultivation showed the similar results in terms of feed value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1790 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

For desalination of reclaimed land, flooding for 3 months or rice cultivation could give higher yield of upland crops such as whole crop barley.

Taxon
whole crop barleye0
Outcome
higher yieldinge0

Verbatim

e0

“3 months flooding treatments of rice cultivation could result in higher yielding for upland crop, such as whole crop barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1959 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

flooding · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

16 papers: 3 positive, 13 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

flooding · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.