Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of micronutrient application on content and uptake of nutrient in green gram (Vigna radiata L.)

Solanke GN; Puri AN; Waghmare MS; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present investigation entitled “Micronutrient Management in Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.)” during Kharif season of the year, 2023-2024 at a field experiment was conducted at experimental field College of Agriculture Latur. The experiment was layout in RBD with three replications and a recommended variety of green gram BM 2003-2 as a test crop along with ten treatments. Significantly higher uptake of N, P, K, Fe and Zn was found in green gram with treatment T9 (application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 + 10 Kg Borax). Available soil nutrient status in post-soil samples after harvest was comparably found maximum than initial soil samples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T9 produced significantly higher uptake of N, P, K, Fe and Zn.

Treatment
application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 + 10 Kg Boraxe0
Outcome
uptake of N, P, K, Fe and Zne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher uptake of N, P, K, Fe and Zn was found in green gram with treatment T9 (application of RDF + 25 kg ha-1 FeSO4 + 25 kg ha-1 ZnSO4 + 10 Kg Borax)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postharvest available soil nutrients were higher than initial soil samples.

Outcome
Available soil nutrient statuse0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
initial soil samplese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Available soil nutrient status in post-soil samples after harvest was comparably found maximum than initial soil samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–662 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

borax · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 76 positive, 3 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.