Abstract
An investigation was carried out at Agricultural research farm of Banda university of Agriculture and Technology Banda U.P. during the Kharif season 2021.The comprehensive aim of experiment was to explore the most appropriate tillage practices for the maize crop that could produce optimum yield more remunerative along with better profitability and also to find out effective nutrient management practices that suited well to the region.The experiment comprises of two factor treatments conducted in split plot design with three main plot factor and three sub-plot factors.The total combination of treatments was nine and each treatment replicate thrice.The main plot consisted of the tillage practices namely, zero tillage, conventional tillage and permanent bed.Further, each main plot had divided in to 3 sub-plots held three nutrient management practices viz.33% recommended dose of nitrogen (40 kg N ha -1 ), 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (N:P:K-120:60:50 kg ha -1 ) and site specific nutrient management (N:P:K-160:50:60 kg ha -1 ).The soil in which experiment conducted was silty clay and their pH value 7.89, EC 0.55 dSm -1 and total organic carbon was 0.76%.The observation in growth parameter and quantitative and qualitative attributes of maize were recorded as per schedule.During the field study it was observed that the highest yield attributes (number of cobs ha -1 , number of rows cob -1 , number of grains row -1 , number of grain cob -1 , nob length (cm), nob girth (cm) and Seed index), grain yield and biological yield recorded under zero tillage.Among the nutrient management practices the site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) practice produced maximum yield (economic yield and biological yield) and yield attributes.Among all interaction of tillage and nutrient management practices, the zero-tillage practice along with SSNM produced maximum output, more remunerative and this combination practically feasible and economically viable to production of maize.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage had the highest maize yield attributes.
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest yield attributes (number of cobs ha -1 , number of rows cob -1 , number of grains row -1 , number of grain cob -1 , nob length (cm), nob girth (cm) and Seed index), grain yield and biological yield recorded under zero tillage”
e1“for the maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage had the highest maize grain and biological yields.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“highest yield attributes (number of cobs ha -1 , number of rows cob -1 , number of grains row -1 , number of grain cob -1 , nob length (cm), nob girth (cm) and Seed index), grain yield and biological yield recorded under zero tillage”
e1“for the maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Site-specific nutrient management gave maximum maize economic and biological yield and yield attributes.
- Treatment
- site-specific nutrient management (SSNM)e0
- Outcome
- economic yield and biological yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“site-specific nutrient management (SSNM) practice produced maximum yield (economic yield and biological yield) and yield attributes”
e1“for the maize crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage with SSNM gave maximum output and was more remunerative for maize.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“zero-tillage practice along with SSNM produced maximum output, more remunerative”
e1“production of maize”
The same questions in other papers
climate site · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
176 papers more in this group
See all 180 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.