Abstract
Among the various insecticides tested against the sucking pests, all the insecticides proved their effectiveness in minimizing the sucking pests incidence when compared to the untreated control.Among them, soapnut powder @ 5g/L spray followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1 ml/L recorded the least damage incidence for all the sucking pests of guava (tea mosquito bug, spiralling whitefly and mealy bug) showing better performance which is on par with detergent powder spray @ 5 g/L followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1ml/L.The next most effective treatments were soapnut powder @ 5 g/L spray following Thiamethoxam 12.6 % + Lambda cyhalothrin 9.5 % ZC @ 0.4 ml/L which was at par with detergent powder -Thiamethoxam 12.6 % + Lambda cyhalothrin 9.5 % ZC @ 0.4 ml/L.Highest net returns and yield was obtained from soapnut powder @ 5g/L spray followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1 ml/L treatment having B:C ratio of 1:4.87, which is in par with detergent powder spray @ 5 g/L followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1ml/L with the B:C ratio of 1:4.70.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
All tested insecticides minimized sucking pest incidence versus untreated control.
- Taxon
- GUAVA
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- all the insecticidese0
- Interactor
- sucking pestse0pest
- Outcome
- sucking pests incidencee0
- Direction
- minimizinge0
- Comparator
- untreated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA”
e0“all the insecticides proved their effectiveness in minimizing the sucking pests incidence when compared to the untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Soapnut then Beta-cyfluthrin plus Imidacloprid had the least damage incidence for guava sucking pests.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavae0
- Treatment
- soapnut powder @ 5g/L spray followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1 ml/Le0
- Interactor
- sucking pestse0pest
- Outcome
- damage incidence for all the sucking pests of guavae0
- Direction
- leaste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA”
e0“soapnut powder @ 5g/L spray followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1 ml/L recorded the least damage incidence for all the sucking pests of guava (tea mosquito bug, spiralling whitefly and mealy bug)”
Claim · model-written summary
Detergent then Beta-cyfluthrin plus Imidacloprid performed on par with the soapnut sequence for pest damage.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavae1
- Treatment
- detergent powder spray @ 5 g/L followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1ml/Le0
- Interactor
- sucking pestse1pest
- Outcome
- damage incidence for all the sucking pests of guavae1
- Direction
- on pare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA”
e0“which is on par with detergent powder spray @ 5 g/L followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1ml/L”
e1“least damage incidence for all the sucking pests of guava”
Claim · model-written summary
Soapnut then Thiamethoxam plus Lambda cyhalothrin was the next most effective treatment.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavae1
- Treatment
- soapnut powder @ 5 g/L spray following Thiamethoxam 12.6 % + Lambda cyhalothrin 9.5 % ZC @ 0.4 ml/Le0
- Interactor
- sucking pestse1pest
- Outcome
- most effectivee0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA”
e0“The next most effective treatments were soapnut powder @ 5 g/L spray following Thiamethoxam 12.6 % + Lambda cyhalothrin 9.5 % ZC @ 0.4 ml/L”
e1“sucking pests of guava”
Claim · model-written summary
Detergent then Thiamethoxam plus Lambda cyhalothrin was on par with the soapnut sequence.
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavae1
- Treatment
- detergent powder -Thiamethoxam 12.6 % + Lambda cyhalothrin 9.5 % ZC @ 0.4 ml/Le0
- Interactor
- sucking pestse1pest
- Outcome
- at pare0
- Direction
- at pare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA”
e0“which was at par with detergent powder -Thiamethoxam 12.6 % + Lambda cyhalothrin 9.5 % ZC @ 0.4 ml/L”
e1“sucking pests of guava”
Claim · model-written summary
Soapnut then Beta-cyfluthrin plus Imidacloprid gave highest net returns and yield, with a 1:4.87 benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- GUAVAPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- soapnut powder @ 5g/L spray followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1 ml/Le0
- Outcome
- net returns and yielde0
- Direction
- Higheste0
- Value
- 1:4.87e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA”
e0“Highest net returns and yield was obtained from soapnut powder @ 5g/L spray followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1 ml/L treatment having B:C ratio of 1:4.87”
Claim · model-written summary
Detergent then Beta-cyfluthrin plus Imidacloprid was on par for net returns and yield, with a 1:4.70 ratio.
- Taxon
- GUAVAPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- detergent powder spray @ 5 g/L followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1ml/Le0
- Outcome
- net returns and yielde1
- Direction
- in pare0
- Value
- 1:4.70e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“GUAVA”
e0“which is in par with detergent powder spray @ 5 g/L followed by Beta-cyfluthrin 8.49 % + Imidacloprid 19.81 % OD @ 1ml/L with the B:C ratio of 1:4.70”
e1“Highest net returns and yield”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
application · disease · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →botanical · disease · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →botanical · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →application · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
61 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
58 papers more in this group
See all 62 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.