Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

To study the influence of planting geometry and nitrogen level on quality attributes nitrogen uptake and economics of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Shashank Shekher Singh; Permendra Singh; Anil Singh; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for two years during kharif season of 2017 and 2018 at Agronomy research Farm, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya (U.P.) on sandy loam soil with a pH of 8.1 to study the Influence of planting geometry and nitrogen levels on rice (Oryza sativa L.)”. The experiment was laid out in split plot design (SPD) with three replications Sixteen treatment combinations; comprised of four planting geometry, viz. (S1) 15x10 cm, 15x15 (S2),20x10 (S3) and 20x15 (S4) were kept in main plot and four nitrogen level, viz. 0kg/ha (N0), 60kg/ha (N1), 120kg/ha (N2) and 180kg/ha (N3) were kept in sub plot. Protein content of rice grain was not significantly affected due to planting geometry and N level during both the years of investigation, whereas plant spacing of 20×10 cm recorded higher nitrogen uptake in grain which was at par with 15×15cm spacing while significant over rest both of the planting geometry. Cost of cultivation was recorded highest (Rs. 35435/ha) under S1N3 under planting geometry of 15×10 cm spacing applied with 180kg N/ha followed by (Rs.35045/ha), while application of 120kg nitrogen/ha given in 20×10 cm spacing recorded highest gross return Rs.102140/ha followed by Rs. 101845/ha in 15×15cm spacing applied with 180kg N/ha due to higher yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting geometry did not significantly affect rice grain protein content in either year.

Treatment
planting geometrye0
Outcome
Protein content of rice graine0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content of rice grain was not significantly affected due to planting geometry and N level during both the years of investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level did not significantly affect rice grain protein content in either year.

Treatment
N levele0
Outcome
Protein content of rice graine0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content of rice grain was not significantly affected due to planting geometry and N level during both the years of investigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing at 20×10 cm produced higher grain nitrogen uptake than most other geometries, and was at par with 15×15cm.

Treatment
20×10 cme0
Outcome
nitrogen uptake in graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
15×15cm spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant spacing of 20×10 cm recorded higher nitrogen uptake in grain which was at par with 15×15cm spacing while significant over rest both of the planting geometry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–961 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–310 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15×10 cm spacing with 180kg N/ha had the highest cultivation cost, Rs. 35435/ha.

Treatment
15×10 cm spacing applied with 180kg N/hae0
Outcome
Cost of cultivatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 35435/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cost of cultivation was recorded highest (Rs. 35435/ha) under S1N3 under planting geometry of 15×10 cm spacing applied with 180kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–310 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20×10 cm spacing with 120kg nitrogen/ha had the highest gross return, Rs.102140/ha.

Treatment
120kg nitrogen/ha given in 20×10 cm spacinge0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs.102140/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 120kg nitrogen/ha given in 20×10 cm spacing recorded highest gross return Rs.102140/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1232 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–310 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

15×15cm spacing with 180kg N/ha had the next highest gross return, Rs. 101845/ha.

Treatment
15×15cm spacing applied with 180kg N/hae0
Outcome
gross returne1
Value
Rs. 101845/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rs. 101845/ha in 15×15cm spacing applied with 180kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1301 · show in text ↑
e1

“gross return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1219 · show in text ↑
e2

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–310 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

100 papers: 89 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.