Paper · 2025 · Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management

Nitrogen fertilizer improves no‐till soybean seed yield

Mark A. Kendall; Spyridon Mourtzinis; John M. Gaska; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract No‐tillage (NT) soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] following corn ( Zea mays L.) is a common practice in the United States. It reduces production costs associated with tillage such as labor, fuel, and equipment, in addition to providing environmental benefits such as reduced erosion and carbon emissions. However, in some situations, NT soybean seed yield can be reduced compared to conventional tillage (CT). The objectives of this study were to (i) quantify the effects of nitrogen, corn residue management, and tillage on soybean seed yield, and (ii) recommend optimal residue and nitrogen (N) management strategies for NT soybean following corn. The study was conducted at the University of Wisconsin‐Madison Arlington Agricultural Research Station near Arlington, WI, during the 2022 and 2023 growing seasons. Treatments were tested in a randomized complete block design with four replicates. Treatments were combinations of NT, CT, N fertilizer application, and corn residue management (removed, chopped, or none). Soybean seed yield was not affected by removing corn residue. Applying 30 lbs N acre −1 prior to NT planting soybean into corn residue and CT increased seed yield by 4.1 bu acre −1 (6.1%) and 5.3 bu acre −1 (7.8%), respectively compared to NT soybean planted into corn residue. The addition of a low rate of spring N can be a tool for producers to increase NT soybean seed yield rather than performing tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing corn residue did not affect no-till soybean seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
removing corn residuee1
Outcome
Soybean seed yielde1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Soybean seed yield was not affected by removing corn residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 30 lb N per acre before no-till planting into corn residue increased seed yield by 4.1 bu per acre (6.1%) compared with no-till soybean in corn residue.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Applying 30 lbs N acre −1 prior to NT planting soybean into corn residuee2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
4.1 bu acre −1 (6.1%)e2
Comparator
NT soybean planted into corn residuee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Soybean seed yield was not affected by removing corn residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1090 · show in text ↑
e2

“Applying 30 lbs N acre −1 prior to NT planting soybean into corn residue and CT increased seed yield by 4.1 bu acre −1 (6.1%) and 5.3 bu acre −1 (7.8%), respectively compared to NT soybean planted into corn residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 30 lb N per acre before conventional tillage planting increased seed yield by 5.3 bu per acre (7.8%) compared with no-till soybean in corn residue.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Applying 30 lbs N acre −1 prior to NT planting soybean into corn residue and CTe2
Outcome
seed yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
5.3 bu acre −1 (7.8%)e2
Comparator
NT soybean planted into corn residuee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Soybean seed yield was not affected by removing corn residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1090 · show in text ↑
e2

“Applying 30 lbs N acre −1 prior to NT planting soybean into corn residue and CT increased seed yield by 4.1 bu acre −1 (6.1%) and 5.3 bu acre −1 (7.8%), respectively compared to NT soybean planted into corn residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1306 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A low rate of spring nitrogen can be used to increase no-till soybean seed yield instead of tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
a low rate of spring Ne3
Outcome
NT soybean seed yielde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Soybean seed yield was not affected by removing corn residue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1090 · show in text ↑
e3

“The addition of a low rate of spring N can be a tool for producers to increase NT soybean seed yield rather than performing tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1439 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

70 papers: 48 positive, 22 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.