Paper · 2025 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Efficacy of herbicides on weed parameters and yield of greengram [Vigna radiata Wiljeck]

LOKESH KUMAR JAIN; AKHILESH JAIN

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Weed management studies were conducted to find out economically viable and cost-effective application of herbicides on productivity of greengram during kharif season of 2020–21 and 2021–22 on sandy loam soils of Rajasthan. The 10-treatments with 4 replications were tested in randomized block design. Herbicide fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% SL @ 220 g/ha recorded the maximum weed control efficiency and weed dry matter and found at par with sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop propargyl 8% EC @187.5 g/ha and propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w @ 135 g/ha applied at 20 DAS. These were significantly superior over weedy check. Improvement in the crop growth, yield attributes and yield were also recorded with above herbicides. Although, hoeing twice at 25 and 40 DAS recorded higher seed yield but low B:C ratio (2.8) as compared to fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% SL @ 220 g/ha (3.1) and sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop propargyl 8% EC @ 187.5 g/ha (3.1) and propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w @ 135 g/ha at 20 DAS (3.0). Hence, application of herbicides in greengram holds a great promise for timely, cost effective and economic weed management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen plus fluazifop-p-butyl achieved maximum weed control efficiency, comparable with two other mixtures and superior to weedy check.

Treatment
fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% SL @ 220 g/hae0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram [Vigna radiata Wiljeck]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Herbicide fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% SL @ 220 g/ha recorded the maximum weed control efficiency and weed dry matter and found at par with sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop propargyl 8% EC @187.5 g/ha and propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w @ 135 g/ha applied at 20 DAS. These were significantly superior over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three herbicide mixtures improved crop growth, yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
above herbicidese0
Outcome
crop growth, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
Improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram [Vigna radiata Wiljeck]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“Improvement in the crop growth, yield attributes and yield were also recorded with above herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoeings gave higher seed yield.

Treatment
hoeing twice at 25 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% SL @ 220 g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram [Vigna radiata Wiljeck]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“hoeing twice at 25 and 40 DAS recorded higher seed yield but low B:C ratio (2.8) as compared to fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% SL @ 220 g/ha (3.1) and sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop propargyl 8% EC @ 187.5 g/ha (3.1) and propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w @ 135 g/ha at 20 DAS (3.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hoeings gave a lower benefit to cost ratio than the herbicide mixtures.

Treatment
hoeing twice at 25 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
lowe0
Value
2.8e0
Comparator
fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% SL @ 220 g/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram [Vigna radiata Wiljeck]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“hoeing twice at 25 and 40 DAS recorded higher seed yield but low B:C ratio (2.8) as compared to fomesafen 11.1% + fluazifop-p-butyl 11.1% SL @ 220 g/ha (3.1) and sodium acifluorfen 16.5% + clodinafop propargyl 8% EC @ 187.5 g/ha (3.1) and propaquizafop 2.5% + imazethapyr 3.75% w/w @ 135 g/ha at 20 DAS (3.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–1068 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend herbicides for timely and economical weed management in greengram.

Outcome
timely, cost effective and economic weed managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“greengram [Vigna radiata Wiljeck]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of herbicides in greengram holds a great promise for timely, cost effective and economic weed management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1193 · show in text ↑

fluazifop-P-butyl · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fomesafen · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.