Paper · 2025 · Crop Research

Effect of gibberellic acid application on berry yield and quality of grapevine cv. Cabernet Sauvignon

ANIL KUMAR ACHARYA; DURGA MANI GAUTAM; BHIM BAHADUR KHATRI; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nepal imports vast amounts of fresh and dried grapes every year and the trend is increasing. The massive gap in demand and production shows a great scope to expand the production of quality grapes. Gibberellic Acid (GA3), an important plant growth regulator, is used to cluster (bunch) loosening, thinning berries, and increasing berry sizes for better yield and quality of berries, however, the timing and stages of application are crucial. This study was carried out to assess the effect of GA3 doses and identify the suitable berry stage for its application in cv. Cabernet Sauvignon during 2023 and 2024 in a commercial vineyard at Patleban Vineyard and Winery, Dhading, Nepal. Experiments were carried out in randomized complete block design with two factors i.e., three doses of GA3 (0, 5 and 10 ppm) and three stages of application (post-flowering, 4-5 mm size berry and both post-flowering and 4-5 mm berry stage). The applied GA3 doses along with different stages of its application had no significant effect on the yield and quality attributes of berry. In 2023 and 2024, berry transversal and longitudinal diameters partially influenced berry weight variation. On average, the transversal diameter accounted for 30.56% of the variation, while the longitudinal diameter explained 24.33%. Sizing spray (i.e. post-set berry) of GA₃ after berry set is ineffective for improving yield in Cabernet Sauvignon. However, due to variability among grape cultivars, its application may benefit other wine grapes. Further, cultivar-specific research is recommended to optimize GA₃ use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 dose and application stage had no significant effect on berry yield.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignont0
Treatment
applied GA3 doses along with different stages of its applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applied GA3 doses along with different stages of its application had no significant effect on the yield and quality attributes of berry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 dose and application stage had no significant effect on berry quality attributes.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignont0
Treatment
applied GA3 doses along with different stages of its applicatione0
Outcome
quality attributes of berrye0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The applied GA3 doses along with different stages of its application had no significant effect on the yield and quality attributes of berry.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry transversal diameter accounted for 30.56% of berry weight variation.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignont0
Organ / stage
berrye1
Outcome
variatione0
Value
30.56%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the transversal diameter accounted for 30.56% of the variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“berry weight variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry longitudinal diameter explained 24.33% of berry weight variation.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignont0
Organ / stage
berrye1
Outcome
berry weight variatione1
Value
24.33%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the longitudinal diameter explained 24.33%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1297 · show in text ↑
e1

“berry weight variation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude post-set GA3 sizing spray is ineffective for improving Cabernet Sauvignon yield.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone0
Outcome
ineffective for improving yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sizing spray (i.e. post-set berry) of GA₃ after berry set is ineffective for improving yield in Cabernet Sauvignon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–101 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend cultivar-specific research to optimize GA3 use.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Outcome
cultivar-specific research is recommended to optimize GA₃ usee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Further, cultivar-specific research is recommended to optimize GA₃ use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1512–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

“grapevine cv. Cabernet Sauvignon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–101 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · quality: general · VitisResults differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.