Paper · 2025 · Plant Biology

Direct and indirect effects of the epiphyte Tillandsia recurvata (Bromeliaceae) on the growth of three of its phorophytes: A greenhouse experiment

N. V. García‐García; S. Valencia‐Díaz; C. A. Vergara‐Torres; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

It is assumed that commensalistic and amensalistic relationships describe the interactions between epiphytes and their phorophytes. However, several correlational studies suggest that these interactions can be antagonistic (structural parasitism) or mutualistic. The few field experiments showed contradictory outcomes and did not control for branch age (being older branches with epiphytes). To test the effect of the epiphytic bromeliad Tillandsia recurvata on growth of their phorophytes, we performed a 1-year greenhouse experiment using three phorophyte species. In these, the natural abundance of T. recurvata differed. We used 2-year-old plants of Ipomoea murucoides and 1-year-old sibling saplings of Bursera copallifera and B. fagaroides. Each phorophyte individual was randomly subjected to the presence of T. recurvata in the crown (30% cover or free) or planted with T. recurvata litter in the soil. We found no effect of T. recurvata on growth of I. murucoides. For B. fagaroides, T. recurvata was a structural parasite because of reduced shoot survival when added to the soil. In B. copallifera, T. recurvata reduced shoot survival when present in the crown but increased shoot survival when added to the soil, which had a strong positive effect. Our evidence shows that the relationship between T. recurvata and its phorophytes cannot be generalized. Effect depends on phorophyte species. Our experiment also shows the importance of resolving ideas on the impact of epiphytes in the crown and when grown into the forest soil, suggesting that the indirect effect through the soil is more important.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T. recurvata did not affect I. murucoides growth.

Taxon
I. murucoidesIpomoea murucoidese0
Treatment
T. recurvatae0
Interactor
T. recurvataTillandsia recurvatae0other
Outcome
growth of I. murucoidese0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea murucoides
Ipomoea murucoides · TaxonBodofzt · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tillandsia recurvata
Tillandsia recurvata · InteractorKohlnf · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found no effect of T. recurvata on growth of I. murucoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil addition reduced B. fagaroides shoot survival.

Taxon
B. fagaroidesBursera fagaroidese0
Treatment
T. recurvatae0
Interactor
T. recurvataTillandsia recurvatae0parasite
Outcome
shoot survivale0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
added to the soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bursera fagaroides
Bursera fagaroides · TaxonMichael Wolf · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tillandsia recurvata
Tillandsia recurvata · InteractorKohlnf · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For B. fagaroides, T. recurvata was a structural parasite because of reduced shoot survival when added to the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crown T. recurvata reduced B. copallifera shoot survival.

Taxon
B. copalliferaBursera copalliferae0
Treatment
T. recurvatae0
Interactor
T. recurvataTillandsia recurvatae0other
Outcome
shoot survivale0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
present in the crowne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bursera copallifera
Bursera copallifera · TaxonNaturaLista user: luispauperrimo · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tillandsia recurvata
Tillandsia recurvata · InteractorKohlnf · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In B. copallifera, T. recurvata reduced shoot survival when present in the crown but increased shoot survival when added to the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil T. recurvata increased B. copallifera shoot survival.

Taxon
B. copalliferaBursera copalliferae0
Treatment
T. recurvatae0
Interactor
T. recurvataTillandsia recurvatae0other
Outcome
shoot survivale0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
added to the soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bursera copallifera
Bursera copallifera · TaxonNaturaLista user: luispauperrimo · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tillandsia recurvata
Tillandsia recurvata · InteractorKohlnf · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In B. copallifera, T. recurvata reduced shoot survival when present in the crown but increased shoot survival when added to the soil, which had a strong positive effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1259 · show in text ↑