Paper · 2025 · Asian Journal of Research in Zoology

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Some Chemical and Biological Pesticides in Controlling the Two-spotted Spider Mite (Tetranychus urticae) on Different Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Cultivars and their Impact on Pest Population Dynamics

El-Shamy E. Abd El-ghfar; Mahmoud K. Abada; Hassan, A. A. Gad El-Kareem; et al.

13
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, is a major pest damaging common bean crops worldwide. This study was conducted to monitor the population dynamics of T. urticae on four common bean cultivars (Bronko, Giza-6, Valentino, and Nebraska) during 2023 and 2024 growing seasons. Also, the efficacies of six acaricides, against the motile stages of the mite, were assessed. Results showed significant differences in cultivar susceptibility. Nebraska exhibited the highest infestation levels, while Bronko demonstrated the greatest tolerance, likely due to morphological and biochemical defense mechanisms. Valentino and Giza-6 showed intermediate susceptibility. Seasonal variations influenced population peaks, with earlier infestations observed in 2024, potentially due to climatic factors. Acaricide efficacy trials revealed that abamectin was the most effective, followed by spiromesifen and fenpyroximate. Bifenazate provided moderate control, while pyridaben and hexythiazox were the least effective, likely due to insect tolerance and to mode of action of acaricides. These findings emphasize the need for integrated pest management strategies, including the selection of insect-tolerant cultivars and acaricide rotation to mitigate resistance. Continuous monitoring of insect populations is recommended to improve control measures. The present study can be recommended to carry out further studies for the management of the two-spotted spider mite, T. urticae on common bean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Common bean cultivars differed significantly in susceptibility.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
cultivar susceptibilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed significant differences in cultivar susceptibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–452 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nebraska had the highest infestation levels of Tetranychus urticae among the cultivars.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Nebraskae1
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
infestation levelse1
Qualifier
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e0

“The two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, is a major pest damaging common bean crops worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nebraska exhibited the highest infestation levels, while Bronko demonstrated the greatest tolerance, likely due to morphological and biochemical defense mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–617 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronko had the greatest tolerance to Tetranychus urticae among the cultivars.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Bronkoe1
Outcome
tolerancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nebraska exhibited the highest infestation levels, while Bronko demonstrated the greatest tolerance, likely due to morphological and biochemical defense mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–617 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bronko tolerance to the mite is likely due to morphological and biochemical defense mechanisms.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Bronkoe1
Outcome
tolerancee1
Qualifier
morphological and biochemical defense mechanismse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nebraska exhibited the highest infestation levels, while Bronko demonstrated the greatest tolerance, likely due to morphological and biochemical defense mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–617 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Valentino and Giza-6 showed intermediate susceptibility to the spider mite.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Valentino and Giza-6e1
Outcome
susceptibilitye1
Qualifier
intermediatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Valentino and Giza-6 showed intermediate susceptibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–674 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal variations influenced the population peaks of the spider mite on common bean.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
population peakse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seasonal variations influenced population peaks, with earlier infestations observed in 2024, potentially due to climatic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–804 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestations of the spider mite on common bean were earlier in 2024, potentially due to climatic factors.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
earlier infestationse1
Qualifier
potentially due to climatic factorse1
Setting
in 2024e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e0

“The two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, is a major pest damaging common bean crops worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seasonal variations influenced population peaks, with earlier infestations observed in 2024, potentially due to climatic factors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abamectin was the most effective acaricide against Tetranychus urticae, followed by spiromesifen and fenpyroximate.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
abamectine1
Interactor
Tetranychus urticaeTetranychus urticaee0pest
Outcome
efficacye1
Direction
most effectivee1
Comparator
spiromesifen and fenpyroximatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tetranychus urticae
Tetranychus urticae · InteractorGilles San Martin from Namur, Belgium · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e0

“The two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, is a major pest damaging common bean crops worldwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Acaricide efficacy trials revealed that abamectin was the most effective, followed by spiromesifen and fenpyroximate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bifenazate provided moderate control of the spider mite.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Bifenazatee1
Outcome
moderate controle1
Direction
moderatee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bifenazate provided moderate control, while pyridaben and hexythiazox were the least effective, likely due to insect tolerance and to mode of action of acaricides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyridaben and hexythiazox were the least effective acaricides against the spider mite.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
pyridaben and hexythiazoxe1
Outcome
least effectivee1
Direction
least effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bifenazate provided moderate control, while pyridaben and hexythiazox were the least effective, likely due to insect tolerance and to mode of action of acaricides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1086 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low efficacy of pyridaben and hexythiazox is likely due to insect tolerance and mode of action of acaricides.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
pyridaben and hexythiazoxe1
Outcome
least effectivee1
Qualifier
insect tolerance and to mode of action of acaricidese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bifenazate provided moderate control, while pyridaben and hexythiazox were the least effective, likely due to insect tolerance and to mode of action of acaricides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1086 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated pest management strategies, including insect-tolerant cultivars and acaricide rotation, are needed for the spider mite on common bean.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
integrated pest management strategiese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“These findings emphasize the need for integrated pest management strategies, including the selection of insect-tolerant cultivars and acaricide rotation to mitigate resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1263 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous monitoring of insect populations is recommended to improve control measures for the spider mite on common bean.

Taxon
Phaseolus vulgarisPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
Continuous monitoring of insect populationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Continuous monitoring of insect populations is recommended to improve control measures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1351 · show in text ↑

abamectin · Tetranychus urticae · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.