Paper · 2024 · Current Horticulture

Effect of light-emitting diodes on somatic embryogenesis and tissue-cultured plantlet growth of arecanut (Areca catechu) dwarf hybrid VTLAH-2

Aparna Veluru; K. Devakumar; M. Neema; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate the effects of LEDs on embryogenic callus proliferation, somatic embryo formation and tissue cultured plantlet growth of arecanut (Areca catechu L.) dwarf hybrid (VTLAH-2) at ICAR-CPCRI, Kasaragod, Kerala, during 2021-2022. Yellow, red, blue, white monochromatic LEDs, and a combination of red: blue and blue: yellow with different photosynthetic photon flux densities (PPFDs 10, 20 and 100 µmol m-2s-1) were used. Eeuwen’s Y3 basal media supplemented with picloram 2.5 µM were used for multiplication of calli. Embryogenic calli were inoculated to multiplication media, and these plates were kept under different LED conditions to examine calli multiplication and somatic embryogenesis. To check the growth of plantlets, germinated somatic embryos were transferred to test tubes containing arecanut plantlet growing media (i.e., 0.5 mg/L BAP +0.5 mg/L NAA and +0.25 mg/L IBA with Y3 basal medium. Multiplication rate of arecanut embryogenic calli (0.051±0.008 gg-1d-1), somatic embryo formation (46.1±2.9), plantlet growth (RGR-wt.0.9±0.07 gg-1d-1; RGR-ht: 0.57±0.01 cm.cm-1d-1) and survival (61.4±4.3%) were found to be superior under a combination of red-yellow LED, which was followed by blue and yellow monochromatic LEDs. Whereas comparatively lower callus multiplication (0.008±0.001 gg-1d-1) and plantlet growth (RGR-wt: 0.72±0.03 gg-1d-1; RGR-ht: 0.24±0.12 cm.cm-1d-1) was noticed with white and red LEDs with a PPFD values of 100 µmol m-2s-1 and 20 µmol m-2s-1 consecutively. Thus, there was a positive effect of LED light source on arecanut somatic embryogenesis and plantlet growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-yellow LEDs gave superior embryogenic callus multiplication at 0.051±0.008 gg-1d-1.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechue0
Treatment
red-yellow LEDe0
Outcome
Multiplication rate of arecanut embryogenic callie0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.051±0.008 gg-1d-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Multiplication rate of arecanut embryogenic calli (0.051±0.008 gg-1d-1), somatic embryo formation (46.1±2.9), plantlet growth (RGR-wt.0.9±0.07 gg-1d-1; RGR-ht: 0.57±0.01 cm.cm-1d-1) and survival (61.4±4.3%) were found to be superior under a combination of red-yellow LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-yellow LEDs gave superior somatic embryo formation of 46.1±2.9.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechut0
Treatment
red-yellow LEDe0
Outcome
somatic embryo formatione0
Direction
superiore0
Value
46.1±2.9e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“somatic embryo formation (46.1±2.9), plantlet growth (RGR-wt.0.9±0.07 gg-1d-1; RGR-ht: 0.57±0.01 cm.cm-1d-1) and survival (61.4±4.3%) were found to be superior under a combination of red-yellow LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“arecanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-yellow LEDs gave superior plantlet weight growth of 0.9±0.07 gg-1d-1.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechut0
Treatment
red-yellow LEDe0
Outcome
RGR-wte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.9±0.07 gg-1d-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plantlet growth (RGR-wt.0.9±0.07 gg-1d-1; RGR-ht: 0.57±0.01 cm.cm-1d-1) and survival (61.4±4.3%) were found to be superior under a combination of red-yellow LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“arecanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-yellow LEDs gave superior plantlet height growth of 0.57±0.01 cm.cm-1d-1.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechut0
Treatment
red-yellow LEDe0
Outcome
RGR-hte0
Direction
superiore0
Value
0.57±0.01 cm.cm-1d-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plantlet growth (RGR-wt.0.9±0.07 gg-1d-1; RGR-ht: 0.57±0.01 cm.cm-1d-1) and survival (61.4±4.3%) were found to be superior under a combination of red-yellow LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“arecanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red-yellow LEDs gave superior plantlet survival of 61.4±4.3%.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechut0
Treatment
red-yellow LEDe0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
superiore0
Value
61.4±4.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“survival (61.4±4.3%) were found to be superior under a combination of red-yellow LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1207 · show in text ↑
t0

“arecanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White LEDs gave comparatively lower callus multiplication of 0.008±0.001 gg-1d-1.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechut0
Treatment
whitee0
Outcome
callus multiplicatione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.008±0.001 gg-1d-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparatively lower callus multiplication (0.008±0.001 gg-1d-1) and plantlet growth (RGR-wt: 0.72±0.03 gg-1d-1; RGR-ht: 0.24±0.12 cm.cm-1d-1) was noticed with white and red LEDs with a PPFD values of 100 µmol m-2s-1 and 20 µmol m-2s-1 consecutively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“arecanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LEDs gave comparatively lower plantlet weight growth of 0.72±0.03 gg-1d-1.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechut0
Treatment
red LEDse0
Outcome
RGR-wte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.72±0.03 gg-1d-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparatively lower callus multiplication (0.008±0.001 gg-1d-1) and plantlet growth (RGR-wt: 0.72±0.03 gg-1d-1; RGR-ht: 0.24±0.12 cm.cm-1d-1) was noticed with white and red LEDs with a PPFD values of 100 µmol m-2s-1 and 20 µmol m-2s-1 consecutively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“arecanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LEDs gave comparatively lower plantlet height growth of 0.24±0.12 cm.cm-1d-1.

Taxon
arecanutAreca catechut0
Treatment
red LEDse0
Outcome
RGR-hte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.24±0.12 cm.cm-1d-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Areca catechu
Areca catechu · TaxonPratheepps · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparatively lower callus multiplication (0.008±0.001 gg-1d-1) and plantlet growth (RGR-wt: 0.72±0.03 gg-1d-1; RGR-ht: 0.24±0.12 cm.cm-1d-1) was noticed with white and red LEDs with a PPFD values of 100 µmol m-2s-1 and 20 µmol m-2s-1 consecutively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1523 · show in text ↑
t0

“arecanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–104 · show in text ↑