Abstract
In Tamaulipas, citrus production faces a phytosanitary risk due to the presence of Anastrepha ludens (Loew,1873), Anastrepha obliqua (Macquart, 1835), Anastrepha serpentina (Wiedemann, 1830), and Anastrepha striata (Schiner, 1868), since the females of these species oviposit inside the fruit, and the larval instars feed on them. However, the population fluctuation of these four species in the citrus-growing region of Tamaulipas remains unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the population fluctuation of A. ludens, A. obliquas, A. serpentina, and A. striata in Early orange (Citrus sinensis var. Navelina), Valencia orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck) and Red grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macfad var. Red Blush) cultivars in the municipalities of Güémez, Llera de Canales, Padilla and Victoria, Tamaulipas. To accomplish this, Multilure traps baited with hydrolyzed protein were deployed for 52 weeks, and the number of captured adults was recorded to calculate the FTD (Flies/Trap/Day) index. The data were then analyzed using analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test to assess differences among crops. The results showed that the average capture rates of A. ludens, A. serpentina and A. striata were similar in three citrus varieties, while the abundance of A. obliquas was significantly different in Valencia orange crop. Additionally, A. obliquas, A. serpentina and A. striata were recorded from January to August, whereas A. ludens was present from January to December, with peak abundance in March, May and October.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
A. ludens capture rates were similar across three citrus varieties.
- Interactor
- A. ludens
Anastrepha ludense0pest - Outcome
- capture rates of A. ludense0
- Direction
- similare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average capture rates of A. ludens, A. serpentina and A. striata were similar in three citrus varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
A. serpentina capture rates were similar across three citrus varieties.
- Interactor
- A. serpentina
Anastrepha serpentinae0pest - Outcome
- A. serpentinae0
- Direction
- similare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average capture rates of A. ludens, A. serpentina and A. striata were similar in three citrus varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
A. striata capture rates were similar across three citrus varieties.
- Interactor
- A. striata
Anastrepha striatae0pest - Outcome
- A. striatae0
- Direction
- similare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“average capture rates of A. ludens, A. serpentina and A. striata were similar in three citrus varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
A. obliquas abundance differed significantly in Valencia orange.
- Taxon
- Valencia orange
Citrus sinensise0 - Interactor
- A. obliquase0pest
- Outcome
- abundance of A. obliquase0
- Direction
- differente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“abundance of A. obliquas was significantly different in Valencia orange crop”
Claim · model-written summary
A. obliquas was recorded from January to August.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A. obliquas, A. serpentina and A. striata were recorded from January to August”
t0“citrus varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
A. serpentina was recorded from January to August.
- Interactor
- A. serpentinaAnastrepha serpentinae0pest
- Outcome
- A. serpentina and A. striata were recordede0
- Qualifier
- January to Auguste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A. obliquas, A. serpentina and A. striata were recorded from January to August”
t0“citrus varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
A. striata was recorded from January to August.
- Interactor
- A. striataAnastrepha striatae0pest
- Outcome
- A. striata were recordede0
- Qualifier
- January to Auguste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A. obliquas, A. serpentina and A. striata were recorded from January to August”
t0“citrus varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
A. ludens was present throughout January to December, peaking in March, May and October.
- Interactor
- A. ludensAnastrepha ludense0pest
- Outcome
- A. ludens was presente0
- Qualifier
- January to December, with peak abundance in March, May and Octobere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A. ludens was present from January to December, with peak abundance in March, May and October”
t0“citrus varieties”