Paper · 2025 · Ecology Environment and Conservation

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on growth, yield and quality of field pea

Vijaya Kumari; Satish Kumar; Jai Dev Sharma

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during the Rabi season of 2023 at the crop research center, school of agriculture, ITM University, Gwalior (M.P) to find out the effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield and quality of field pea. The field experiment was laid out in a Random block design with ten treatments and three replications viz., T1 - Control, T2 - 100 % RDF (20:40:20), T3 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton FYM ha-1, T4 - 50 % RDF + 2-ton FYM ha-1, T5 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1, T6 - 50 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1, T7 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton FYM ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB, T8 - 50 % RDF + 2-ton FYM ha-1 +Rhizobium + PSB, T9 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB, T10 - 50 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB. Growth parameters like plant height, leaf area index, dry matter and yield attributing characters such as pod length, no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1 were noted highest with treatment, T9 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB. Highest grain and straw yield was obtained with the application of 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB (T9). The crop quality in respect of protein content is increased significantly with conjoint use of bio-fertilizers and Vermicompost and maximum values were recorded with T9 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 +Rhizobium + PSB.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T9 gave the highest plant height, leaf area index, and dry matter.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T9 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, leaf area index, dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth parameters like plant height, leaf area index, dry matter and yield attributing characters such as pod length, no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1 were noted highest with treatment, T9 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T9 gave the highest pod length, pods per plant, and seeds per pod.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
T9 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
pod length, no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield attributing characters such as pod length, no. of pods plant-1, no. of seeds pod-1 were noted highest with treatment, T9 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T9 gave the highest grain and straw yields.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB (T9)e0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
Higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain and straw yield was obtained with the application of 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 + Rhizobium + PSB (T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined biofertilizers and vermicompost significantly increased field pea protein content, with the maximum under T9.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
conjoint use of bio-fertilizers and Vermicomposte0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
maximum values were recorded with T9 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 +Rhizobium + PSBe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“protein content is increased significantly with conjoint use of bio-fertilizers and Vermicompost and maximum values were recorded with T9 - 75 % RDF + 2-ton Vermicompost ha-1 +Rhizobium + PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Rhizobium · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

240 papers: 216 positive, 24 negative or no effect

215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.