Paper · 2025 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Response to Direct and Indirect Selection to Improve Grain Yield of Durum Wheat

Gamal M. M. Soliman; Yaser S. I. Koubisy

14
claims
47
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was conducted over three growing seasons (2020/21, 2021/22, and 2022/23) at Shandaweel Agric. Res. Stat., Agri. Res. Cent., Egypt. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effect of direct selection for grain yield plant-1 and indirect selection for each of spike number plant-1 and 100-kernel weight to improve grain yield and produce new high yielding durum wheat lines. Two pedigree selection cycles were applied from the F2 to F4 generations, focusing on grain yield plant-1, spike number plant-1‎, and 100-kernel weight, under optimal growing conditions. The findings revealed that the phenotypic variance marginally exceeded the genotypic variance, and both generally declined from (F2) to (F4) generation. Following two pedigree selection cycles, broad sense and realized heritability estimates for grain yield plant-1 attained 78.73 and 48.63%, respectively. Similarly, the heritability estimates were 97.29% and 46.14% for the spike number plant-1 ‎ and 91.51% and 61.90% for the weight of 100 kernels. The observed gain following two direct pedigree selection cycles were 11.12 and 8.45% for grain yield plant-1, 5.23 and 2.11% with indirect selection for spike number plant-1 and 7.57 and 10.39% with indirect selection for 100-kernel weight in comparison with the bulk sample and the superior parent, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenotypic variance marginally exceeded genotypic variance.

Outcome
phenotypic variancee0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
genotypic variancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the phenotypic variance marginally exceeded the genotypic variance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenotypic and genotypic variance generally declined from F2 to F4.

Outcome
phenotypic variancee1
Direction
declinede0
Qualifier
(F4) generatione0
Comparator
(F2)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both generally declined from (F2) to (F4) generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“phenotypic variance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–625 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad-sense heritability for grain yield per plant reached 78.73%.

Outcome
broad sensee0
Value
78.73 and 48.63%e0
Qualifier
grain yield plant-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broad sense and realized heritability estimates for grain yield plant-1 attained 78.73 and 48.63%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Realized heritability for grain yield per plant reached 48.63%.

Outcome
realized heritabilitye0
Value
48.63%e0
Qualifier
grain yield plant-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“broad sense and realized heritability estimates for grain yield plant-1 attained 78.73 and 48.63%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad-sense heritability for spike number per plant was 97.29%.

Outcome
spike number plant-1e0
Value
97.29%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heritability estimates were 97.29% and 46.14% for the spike number plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Realized heritability for spike number per plant was 46.14%.

Outcome
spike number plant-1e0
Value
46.14%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“heritability estimates were 97.29% and 46.14% for the spike number plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad-sense heritability for 100-kernel weight was 91.51%.

Outcome
weight of 100 kernelse0
Value
91.51%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“91.51% and 61.90% for the weight of 100 kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Realized heritability for 100-kernel weight was 61.90%.

Outcome
weight of 100 kernelse0
Value
61.90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“91.51% and 61.90% for the weight of 100 kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct selection increased grain yield per plant by 11.12% relative to bulk.

Treatment
direct pedigree selection cyclese1
Outcome
grain yield plant-1e0
Direction
gaine3
Value
11.12 and 8.45%e0
Comparator
bulk samplee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11.12 and 8.45% for grain yield plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“direct pedigree selection cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1091 · show in text ↑
e2

“bulk sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1302 · show in text ↑
e3

“gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct selection increased grain yield per plant by 8.45% relative to the superior parent.

Treatment
direct pedigree selection cyclese1
Outcome
grain yield plant-1e0
Direction
gaine3
Value
8.45%e0
Comparator
superior parente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11.12 and 8.45% for grain yield plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“direct pedigree selection cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1091 · show in text ↑
e2

“superior parent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1326 · show in text ↑
e3

“gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indirect selection on spike number increased yield by 5.23% relative to bulk.

Treatment
indirect selection for spike number plant-1e0
Outcome
grain yield plant-1e1
Direction
gaine3
Value
5.23 and 2.11%e0
Comparator
bulk samplee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5.23 and 2.11% with indirect selection for spike number plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“The observed gain following two direct pedigree selection cycles were 11.12 and 8.45% for grain yield plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1136 · show in text ↑
e2

“bulk sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1302 · show in text ↑
e3

“gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indirect selection on spike number increased yield by 2.11% relative to the superior parent.

Treatment
indirect selection for spike number plant-1e0
Outcome
grain yield plant-1e1
Direction
gaine3
Value
2.11%e0
Comparator
superior parente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5.23 and 2.11% with indirect selection for spike number plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“The observed gain following two direct pedigree selection cycles were 11.12 and 8.45% for grain yield plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1136 · show in text ↑
e2

“superior parent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1326 · show in text ↑
e3

“gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indirect selection on 100-kernel weight increased yield by 7.57% relative to bulk.

Treatment
indirect selection for 100-kernel weighte0
Outcome
grain yield plant-1e1
Direction
gaine3
Value
7.57 and 10.39%e0
Comparator
bulk samplee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7.57 and 10.39% with indirect selection for 100-kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“The observed gain following two direct pedigree selection cycles were 11.12 and 8.45% for grain yield plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1136 · show in text ↑
e2

“bulk sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1302 · show in text ↑
e3

“gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1044 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indirect selection on 100-kernel weight increased yield by 10.39% relative to the superior parent.

Treatment
indirect selection for 100-kernel weighte0
Outcome
grain yield plant-1e1
Direction
gaine3
Value
10.39%e0
Comparator
superior parente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“7.57 and 10.39% with indirect selection for 100-kernel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Durum Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“The observed gain following two direct pedigree selection cycles were 11.12 and 8.45% for grain yield plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1136 · show in text ↑
e2

“superior parent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1326 · show in text ↑
e3

“gain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1044 · show in text ↑