Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

The stomatal characteristics of monocots and dicots at different altitudes

Hasan Rusdi; Setiawati Tia; Nurzaman Mohamad; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study investigates the differences in stomatal characteristics between plants growing in lowland and highland altitudes, focusing on parameters such as stomatal type, distribution, number, density and index. A quantitative descriptive approach was employed, with sample collection conducted through purposive sampling. A total of 144 leaves were collected from 8 species, including both dicot and monocot, originating from low and high-altitude areas. The dicot species investigated were Capsicum annuum L., Mangifera indica L., Manilkara zapota (L.) P. Royen, and Psidium guajava L., while the monocot species included Cocos nucifera L., Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott, Curcuma longa L., and Oryza sativa L. Stomatal number, density, and index were statistically analyzed using the t-test, whereas other parameters were assessed descriptively. The results revealed diverse stomatal types and distributions among the examined plant species. For instance, P. guajava exhibited paracytic stomata, C. annuum L. displayed anisocytic stomata, and C. esculenta had a distinct brachy-paracytic stomatal complex of, each plant manifests unique anatomical characteristics. The finding indicated that stomatal attributes, including number, density and index did not differ significantly between plants inhabiting lowland and highland environments within an altitude range of 550 m. This study highlights the influence of broader altitude variations and ecological factors influence stomatal features across diverse plant species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The examined species had diverse stomatal types and distributions.

Taxon
plant speciese0
Outcome
diverse stomatal types and distributionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed diverse stomatal types and distributions among the examined plant species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–946 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. guajava had paracytic stomata.

Taxon
P. guajavaPsidium guajavae0
Outcome
paracytic stomatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. guajava exhibited paracytic stomata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–999 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. annuum L. had anisocytic stomata.

Taxon
C. annuum L.Capsicum annuume0
Outcome
anisocytic stomatae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. annuum L. displayed anisocytic stomata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C. esculenta had a brachy-paracytic stomatal complex.

Taxon
C. esculentaColocasia esculentae0
Outcome
distinct brachy-paracytic stomatal complexe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Colocasia esculenta
Colocasia esculenta · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“C. esculenta had a distinct brachy-paracytic stomatal complex”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1109 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal number, density and index did not differ significantly between lowland and highland plants within 550 m.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Outcome
stomatal attributes, including number, density and indexe0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
within an altitude range of 550 me0
Comparator
lowland and highland environmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal attributes, including number, density and index did not differ significantly between plants inhabiting lowland and highland environments within an altitude range of 550 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1376 · show in text ↑