Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Agro-chemical effects on productivity and profitability of green gram (Vigna radiata L.) under rainfed conditions

Pardeep Phogat; Amarjeet Nibhoria; Ankit Singh; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Green gram is an important pulse crop which is grown widely in arid and semi-arid regions of country. Use of agro-chemicals under rainfed conditions help in altering the ill effect of moisture stress at sensitive stages of green gram. In this study, conducted during Kharif season of 2021 at Regional Research Station, Bawal (Rewari) of CCS Haryana Agricultural University (Hisar) situated in south-west zone of Haryana, Tragacanth katira was drilled in soil before sowing at concentrations of 2.5 and 5.0 kg/ha. Whereas, salicylic acid (100 and 200 mg/l) and potassium nitrate (1%) was foliar sprayed at flowering and pod initiation stages of green gram. Agro-chemicals were able to improve the growth, yield and yield attributes of green gram compared to control and soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1% were introduced as the best treatment under rainfed conditions. It led to an increase in plant height (20.6%), dry matter accumulation (44%), number of pods per plant (60.1%), test weight (15.6%) and yield (26.1%) compared to control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Agrochemicals improved green gram growth, yield and yield attributes compared with control.

Treatment
Agro-chemicalse0
Outcome
growth, yield and yield attributese0
Direction
improvee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Agro-chemicals were able to improve the growth, yield and yield attributes of green gram compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha and potassium nitrate at 1% was the best treatment under rainfed conditions.

Treatment
soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%e0
Outcome
best treatmente0
Direction
beste0
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1% were introduced as the best treatment under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“pod initiation stages of green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected combination increased plant height by 20.6% versus control.

Treatment
soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%e1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20.6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It led to an increase in plant height (20.6%), dry matter accumulation (44%), number of pods per plant (60.1%), test weight (15.6%) and yield (26.1%) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield attributes of green gram compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected combination increased dry matter accumulation by 44% versus control.

Treatment
soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%e1
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It led to an increase in plant height (20.6%), dry matter accumulation (44%), number of pods per plant (60.1%), test weight (15.6%) and yield (26.1%) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield attributes of green gram compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected combination increased pods per plant by 60.1% versus control.

Treatment
soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%e1
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
increasee0
Value
60.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It led to an increase in plant height (20.6%), dry matter accumulation (44%), number of pods per plant (60.1%), test weight (15.6%) and yield (26.1%) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield attributes of green gram compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected combination increased test weight by 15.6% versus control.

Treatment
soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%e1
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15.6%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It led to an increase in plant height (20.6%), dry matter accumulation (44%), number of pods per plant (60.1%), test weight (15.6%) and yield (26.1%) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield attributes of green gram compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected combination increased yield by 26.1% versus control.

Treatment
soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%e1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
26.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It led to an increase in plant height (20.6%), dry matter accumulation (44%), number of pods per plant (60.1%), test weight (15.6%) and yield (26.1%) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil application of Tragacanth katira at 5.0 kg/ha + foliar application of potassium nitrate at 1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–867 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield attributes of green gram compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–764 · show in text ↑

agrochemical · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium nitrate · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

potassium nitrate · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

application · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

216 papers: 209 positive, 7 negative or no effect

208 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

212 papers more in this group

See all 216 papers →

application · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.